![]() |
|
|||
Communication to get call straight
Last night, boys varsity, last minute of a close game. Visitors make a steal and wind up with a 2 on none. B1 lays it up and as ball is on the rim A1 comes flying in and smacks the board. (the classic we're gonna lose now but look how high I can jump thing) Partner was lead, kinda right beside the play, he whistles and emphatically signals basket good. I blew my whistle to get his attention and called a quick huddle. "What did you call?" "Goaltending." "He didn't touch the ball." "Ball had already hit the board." "If he didn't touch the ball, it can't be goaltending." Well, it's a tech, anyway." He shrugged. I thought, uh-oh, he thinks, goaltending, bucket good, technical, close enough. I said, "Technical is what it is, or nothing. It's your call." He went over and huddled with home coach. I saw him gesture in my direction, so I think a part of his explanation was "cuz he said so." Home coach yelled across at me, "Does the basket count?" I shook my head no. Visiting coach meanwhile had a pained expression,
"What....what is the deal?" Partner simply said, "Technical foul." Home coach added, "You're getting the best of the deal." The ironic thing is that I think both coaches were happier with the wrong call than the right call. It turned out to be a non-issue. B missed both t shots, then inbounded, got fouled, and made both. My question is, when I told partner it can't be goaltending, if he had refused to change the call, there would have been nothing further for me to do, right? I was already mentally practicing saying, with a straight face, "He called goaltending, coach."
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove Last edited by just another ref; Tue Dec 27, 2011 at 10:20pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
![]()
If you were calling a game played under FIBA rules your partner would have been correct to call goal tending.
![]() However, it sounds that you handled the situation correctly and got the play right. I hope you and your partner cracked open the book and went over what the correct application of the rule in your post game. |
|
|||
Quote:
This is a very common misconception about BI - one that I used to have. In fact, I'm positive there was a thread about this sometime last year... |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Goaltending (all 5 must be true to be GT): 1. Must be a try. 2. Must be on the way down. 3. Must be completly outside the cylinder. 4. Must be completely above the rim. 5. Must have a chance to go in. Basket Interference (if any 1 of these happen, it's BI): 1. Can't touch the ball if it's in the cylinder. 2. Can't touch the basket or ball if it's on or in the basket. 3. Can't touch the ball (even outside the cylinder) after reaching through the basket. 4. If rim is moved, it can't contact the ball before returning to its original position. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Again the media sets it straight! | LMan | Baseball | 29 | Wed Aug 30, 2006 03:27am |
PU/BU Communication on balk call | DTQ_Blue | Baseball | 3 | Sat May 20, 2006 12:45pm |
straight arm | Texoma_LJ | Football | 4 | Mon Jul 04, 2005 09:20am |
Straight Up | rainmaker | Basketball | 10 | Wed Feb 02, 2005 06:02pm |
Straight from the case book | bigwes68 | Baseball | 12 | Mon May 31, 2004 03:17am |