The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Volleyball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Sat Aug 20, 2005, 07:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
hey....phantom is just down the street from me here in milton, wisconsin.

i had some friends who marched with phantom...also, "back in the day"....glenda hartje and rod maxwell (60's & 70's)...glenda and rod became instructors for a local d-2 corps i was the exec. director for in the 80's (Voyageurs of Rock Co. WI). Rod also was a drum corps judge with me...M&M execution. He also ran our winter guard.

my favorites from PR....An American in Paris-1976 and Nessun Dorma-1991. Oh yes....when Anaheim Kingsmen played Stan Kenton's Artistry in Rhythm-1974....these are keepers!

Man....I could go on......but this is a VB forum!

Thanks again for your help MCBear!
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 24, 2005, 11:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Re: I am assuming that this is Part I?

Quote:
Originally posted by MCBear
imaref,

Here is the rule reference you requested:

59 - T - the answer is T, reference 9-5-4

Hopefully that is a help and will generate further discussion among your group.
MCBear....

I've had several conversations now over this one and seems like most feel the answer is "False". The feeling is that Q. 59's statement describes a "legal" block....not an "illegal" block. (Making the statement "False").

Would you clarify your 'True' response?

("Picky....Picky....Picky")
__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 24, 2005, 11:29am
Resident VB Rules Guru
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Jose, CA - the Capital of Silicon Valley
Posts: 481
Send a message via AIM to MCBear Send a message via MSN to MCBear Send a message via Yahoo to MCBear Send a message via Skype™ to MCBear
wrong reference to the question...

"Back-row Player Action: 59. When a back-row player, whose hands are above the height of the net, makes contact with the ball, it is considered an illegal block."

This is True - a back-row player may not participate in nor attempt a block. Therefore, when the back-row player, whose hands are above the height of the net, makes contact with the ball it is an illegal back-row block per 9-5-5 (sorry about the incorrect reference to 9-5-4 - that is what NF had as the rule reference on the proofing copy of Part I).
__________________
Jan G. Filip - San Jose, CA
EBVOA Rules Interpreter Emeritus
NCS Volleyball Officials Coordinating Committee Recorder
CIF State Volleyball State Championships Referee (2005), Scorekeeper (2006-2007) & Libero Tracker (2010)
PAVO State Referee (2014) / PAVO Certified Scorekeeper (2014) / PAVO Certified Line Judge (2012)
USAV Junior National Referee (resigned 2013) / USAV National Scorekeeper (2014)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 24, 2005, 11:32am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 752
Send a message via ICQ to FMadera Send a message via AIM to FMadera Send a message via Yahoo to FMadera
imaref,

See Rule 9-5-4. The only way in which this would be legal is if the back row player had hands below net height. 9-5-5 specifically states a back row player may not block or attempt to block. With hands above the net, this would be a (poorly worded description of a) block, so it's illegal, since it's a back row player.
__________________
Felix A. Madera
USAV Indoor National / Beach Zonal Referee
FIVB Qualified International Scorer
PAVO National Referee / Certified Line Judge/Scorer
WIAA/IHSA Volleyball Referee
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 24, 2005, 01:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: So. Wisconsin
Posts: 302
Thanx....you two!

Both your clarifications make it "totally" clear!

__________________
"All our calls are good calls...."
"...Some of them are better than others!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1