Un-pulled foot

[tcannizzo]

New thread so as not to hijack Andy's question about un-ringing a swing.

BU in C, play at 1B, BU calls "Off the base - Safe".
Coach follows procedure and asks BU to go for help from PU.

I was PU and was reluctant to give any answer to BU; i.e the conversation is not happening.

UIC who was near by was called over, and stated that PU absolutely may help BU un-pull a foot, so I did it.

I was (at still am) of the opinion that if BU called a pulled foot, he saw a pulled foot. And that no way PU can un-pull the foot. How can someone help un-see something?


Thoughts?

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by tcannizzo

New thread so as not to hijack Andy's question about un-ringing a swing.

BU in C, play at 1B, BU calls "Off the base - Safe".
Coach follows procedure and asks BU to go for help from PU.

I was PU and was reluctant to give any answer to BU; i.e the conversation is not happening.

UIC who was near by was called over, and stated that PU absolutely may help BU un-pull a foot, so I did it.

I was (at still am) of the opinion that if BU called a pulled foot, he saw a pulled foot. And that no way PU can un-pull the foot. How can someone help un-see something?


Thoughts?

It seems to me that happens all the time and BU correctly went with pulled/safe or not sure/safe before asking.

[Manny A]

Maybe I'm not understanding your concern, but I can certainly envision where a BU from C (and even B) might guess that F3 didn't stay on the bag when she made a huge stretch for the ball when the BU didn't have a decent angle to see for sure, and the PU sees that she did. If you saw with 100% surety that F3 maintained contact, but your partner felt otherwise, why wouldn't you want to give him/her what you clearly had?

[tcannizzo]

Manny, that BU "guessed" the pulled foot, is exactly my concern.
As BU, if i am not certain about a pulled foot, and the ball beats BR to 1B, I call the Out and let the BU come to PU for help on a pulled foot. Not the other way around.

[AtlUmpSteve]

See, I was always taught not to guess off the bag; if the ball beat the runner, call the out. Everyone knows to make that appeal when appropriate, everyone knows that PU will answer if he sees the foot off.

This reverse handling seems awkward; the "off the bag" should be an affirmative ruling that was actually seen. I understand Tony's feeling of ruling the opposite of what BU "saw", as opposed to adding a piece of the puzzle.

[jmkupka]

yep, the "off the bag" call should only be made if BU actually saw daylight between foot and bag.

I'm at the 3B end of a 3B-HP rundown. As runner dives back to 3B, fielder dives too. I'm at 90 degrees to the play, & clearly see 2" of daylight between glove and foot.

DC (in 1B dugout, so at 3B line extended), absolutely sure of the tag, begs me to check with my partner (at the HP end of the rundown).

Sure I'll ask, coach, but he'll never convince me I didn't see space...

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by jmkupka

yep, the "off the bag" call should only be made if BU actually saw daylight between foot and bag.

I'm at the 3B end of a 3B-HP rundown. As runner dives back to 3B, fielder dives too. I'm at 90 degrees to the play, & clearly see 2" of daylight between glove and foot.

DC (in 1B dugout, so at 3B line extended), absolutely sure of the tag, begs me to check with my partner (at the HP end of the rundown).

Sure I'll ask, coach, but he'll never convince me I didn't see space...

Then you should just told the coach "no", that you had everything you needed to make that call.