The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 08:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Provo, UT
Posts: 176
Send a message via Yahoo to agr8zebra
Not a Drop 3rd Strike...

Lets say No Body out
Runner at 2nd Base
The count on the batter is 3 balls and 1 Strike
On the pitch the batter swings, the catchers misplays the ball and it is dropped.
The batter thinking the count was 3-2 breaks for 1st base, drawing a throw from the catcher, the ball sails into right field.
The runner on 2nd runs to 3rd on the play and eventually get to home plate/scores on the over throw.

What you got:
Interference on the batter for not knowing the count? She is out put the fun back on 2nd?

Bring the batter back to plate for her now 3-2 count let the run score?

Put the runner back on 2nd and batter back at the plate for the 3-2 count?

Something else?
__________________
Jess

After all that is said and done, more is said than done
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Dumb move catcher. Defense is responsible for knowing the count and making appropriate play. Score the run and bring the batter back to bat.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Provo, UT
Posts: 176
Send a message via Yahoo to agr8zebra
RKBUmp We had a meeting last Monday and this play brought up. I said the same thing, even went possible one step further, because the catcher was not playing on a runner and didn't return the ball to the pitcher, dead-ball , ball four put the batter on 1st.

Can you cite me a rule reference, can't seam to find one exactly, I can by inference, but there is on anal-retentive in our group that will balk and squeal until I find a reference.
__________________
Jess

After all that is said and done, more is said than done
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 09:23am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Dumb move catcher. Defense is responsible for knowing the count and making appropriate play. Score the run and bring the batter back to bat.
^^^ This. Of course, the baseball folks want to blame everyone, but the defense.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 10:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
^^^ This. Of course, the baseball folks want to blame everyone, but the defense.
Huh!
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 10:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by agr8zebra View Post
RKBUmp We had a meeting last Monday and this play brought up. I said the same thing, even went possible one step further, because the catcher was not playing on a runner and didn't return the ball to the pitcher, dead-ball , ball four put the batter on 1st.

Can you cite me a rule reference, can't seam to find one exactly, I can by inference, but there is on anal-retentive in our group that will balk and squeal until I find a reference.
Suggest you pick a rules-set to reference. The effect and ruling is different depending on which one you are asking about.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
The closest I can give you is NFHS case play 3-6-13 Sit B. It involves a batter advancing on ball 3 and the runner also advancing, but same basic principle. The defense is responsible for knowing the count and making the appropriate play. ASA has basically the same clarification that the defense is responsible for knowing the count.

As to your exact play, I had this situation happen in a game I was helping my daughter coach last year and the umpire called the batter out. I argued my case to no avail and eventualy contacted the state rules interpreter citing the case play referenced. He confirmed this would be the same type of situation and the batter should not have been called for interference as the defense should have known the count and played on the runner advancing from 3rd.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 01:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Provo, UT
Posts: 176
Send a message via Yahoo to agr8zebra
Gr8, that 3 6 13 works well.
__________________
Jess

After all that is said and done, more is said than done
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post

As to your exact play, I had this situation happen in a game I was helping my daughter coach last year and the umpire called the batter out. I argued my case to no avail and eventualy contacted the state rules interpreter citing the case play referenced. He confirmed this would be the same type of situation and the batter should not have been called for interference as the defense should have known the count and played on the runner advancing from 3rd.
First thing I would like to know is what rule the umpire was enforcing. Probably win the protest.

SP w/stealing

1st & 2nd, outs irrelevant, 2-2 count on batter, pitch was called a ball and B started toward 1st while saying, "that's 4, right blue?" Catcher looks at the PU for the call and he said, "no, count's 3-2." By the time the catcher turned back toward the infield to return the ball, both runners advanced. Defense was pissed and wanted the runners returned. Didn't happen, PU told them it wasn't anyone's fault but their own that the catcher was distracted.

Protest was not upheld and I educated the team on the term, DMC
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 02:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Believe me, this was only one of several situations we had with this particular umpire over the course of the season. From just a single game I detailed 2 pages worth of blowns calls with rules references and case plays which I submitted to his assigning associations head of officials. Not a thing was done about it.

The play I mentioned above was in the championship playoff, which started with the pitching plate at the wrong distance. His answer was to scratch one in the dirt with his foot. He claimed the athletic association told him to do that and get on with the games. I had my daughter tell him in the pregame meeting she was playing the game under protest as the rules are specific the game cannot start with the plate at the wrong distance. I had all the paperwork filled out to file the protest for not only the pitching plate distance but the out call on the batter. I gave it all to my daughter, which she gave to her principal to file. He chose not to pursue the protest and let it go.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 28, 2015, 02:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Believe me, this was only one of several situations we had with this particular umpire over the course of the season. From just a single game I detailed 2 pages worth of blowns calls with rules references and case plays which I submitted to his assigning associations head of officials. Not a thing was done about it.

The play I mentioned above was in the championship playoff, which started with the pitching plate at the wrong distance. His answer was to scratch one in the dirt with his foot. He claimed the athletic association told him to do that and get on with the games. I had my daughter tell him in the pregame meeting she was playing the game under protest as the rules are specific the game cannot start with the plate at the wrong distance. I had all the paperwork filled out to file the protest for not only the pitching plate distance but the out call on the batter. I gave it all to my daughter, which she gave to her principal to file. He chose not to pursue the protest and let it go.
Would have went ahead and distributed it to all parties concerned. The only way bad situations get corrected is if people of authority act upon them.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Drop 3rd Strike Stevie Softball 4 Sat Apr 16, 2005 07:52pm
Drop 3rd Strike (ASA) jbambas Softball 14 Thu Aug 07, 2003 07:51am
Drop 3rd strike sbnorman Baseball 3 Sat Jun 15, 2002 02:22am
Drop third strike reed2310 Softball 11 Sun Jun 09, 2002 05:36pm
drop third strike kbaerslt Baseball 3 Fri May 03, 2002 11:36am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1