The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Baseball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 01, 2002, 08:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 22
Send a message via AIM to kbaerslt
Batter makes contact with a dropped third strike that the cather has blocked. The batter is outside the batters box when this happens. Is he out or safe? There are no runners on base.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 01, 2002, 10:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,019
Quote:
Originally posted by kbaerslt
Batter makes contact with a dropped third strike that the cather has blocked. The batter is outside the batters box when this happens. Is he out or safe? There are no runners on base.
If it's unintentional, play on.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 02, 2002, 09:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
This discussion has come up before. In FED, the act must be judged intentional to call it interference. In OBR, no such act is specifically covered in the rules, so when it happened in an OBR game I was umping, me and my partner decided that the catcher had a chance to make a play on the ball, and since the batter didn't interfere intentionally, that the ball was live and the batter beat the throw to first.

Incidently, in FED softball, the batter-runner is called out automatically in this case. Intent is not a factor.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 03, 2002, 11:36am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
"In OBR, no such act is specifically covered in the rules, so when it happened in an OBR game I was umping, me and my partner decided that the catcher had a chance to make a play on the ball, and since the batter didn't interfere intentionally, that the ball was live and the batter beat the throw to first."

A play in Jaksa/Roder that covers this type situation provides the OBR interpretation:

R1, two outs. A strike three is blocked (not caught) by the catcher, and the batter-runner, starting his advance to first, kicks the ball, or contacts the catcher who is trying to field the ball: neither case is interference, but if either hindrance was an intentional action, disregarding an advance, there is interference.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1