Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn
Yes, that's what he said.
You're confused because the misapplied rule here was the PU ruling the batter out. He is still saying the same thing.
|
Oh yeah, I see.
My original question was whether this mistake by the PU should be rectified. IOW
whether it qualifies under the jeopardy rule.
That would mean,
IF he could judge that
IF the catcher had not been told an out, would she have tried a play at 1st and
PROBABLY gotten the out.
Notice -
BIG IFs and a
BIG reach by the ump to
ASSUME an out if played at 1st are a
separate question.
Tue Oct 28, 2014, 05:02pm
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
