obstruction award or no?

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

Out of curiosity, I can see no scenario where you and he should have had a conversation about this play. How did that happen?

You are supposed to use an emoticon when being facetious.
or or

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by CecilOne

You are supposed to use an emoticon when being facetious.
or or

But I was not being facetious.

[CecilOne]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

But I was not being facetious.

I figured you were referring to coaches' habit of asking the PU about everything
and one of my pet peeves, the PU discussing a BU call.

Do they really think the PU controls the BU or it just because the PU is closer?

Made worse by the new dominance of challenges on TV where the PU announces the result.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by CecilOne

I figured you were referring to coaches' habit of asking the PU about everything
and one of my pet peeves, the PU discussing a BU call.

Do they really think the PU controls the BU or it just because the PU is closer?

Made worse by the new dominance of challenges on TV where the PU announces the result.

I agree across the board.

Had I been PU in the OP, there's no chance coach and I have any discussion at all. He can talk with BU. BU can talk with me if he needs to, although I can't imagine why - maybe BU's new, I don't know. But my job in this case is not to talk to coach, it's to make sure no one else is approaching my BU, and watching the rest of the field.