|
|||
OBS past base - TCOW
Sorry, another OBS play :
Short grounder to F3, F4 tries to cover 1st, ends up a few inches behind base, foul side, directly in BR path. Meanwhile, F3 fields, keeps ball and backs toward base, leaving no inside room for BR. F4 clearly in the way of BR, never having ball. True or false? As long as BR slows, “pulls up” slightly, or hesitates; even if no turn; OBS is the call; even though F4 is slightly past base. ASA rules priority, but any other you think is different. This topic will not be helped by HTBT responses. Please do not use it to chide or demean each other.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. Last edited by CecilOne; Mon Jul 01, 2013 at 09:53am. |
|
|||
Trying to avoid saying HTBT, but there are considerations here that make that hard to dismiss. There's no "always right" answer to your question without seeing the actual play.
First let me say that it is COMPLETELY reasonable that, especially at first base or the plate (where running straight through is a normal option), you can have obstruction on a fielder located behind the base. Second, however, if you have F3 WITH the ball partially blocking BR's path, you'd better be 100% sure it was F4, and not F3 that caused any slowing or deviation on BR's part. If F3 is the reason for BR slowing or altering, you don't have OBS. If F4 is the reason, you do. I hope that answers the question.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
With F3 having the ball and trying to make a play in the immediate vicinity, an OBS call on F4 would be a tough sell.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
Where was the BR when s/he began to check up? How far from 1B?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Was F4 in foul territory? The reason I ask is because you said it is ASA, which requires a double first base. I am trying to picture why the BR would be obstructed if she was running to the colored base and F4 was behind the white base.
__________________
Kill the Clones. Let God sort them out. No one likes an OOJ (Over-officious jerk). Realistic officiating does the sport good. |
|
|||
Didn't see a reference to the white portion, but there is no rule forbidding the BR from touching the white portion of the base, or running in fair territory.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Red meat is not bad for you. Fuzzy green meat is bad for you. |
|
|||
Quote:
(2) 1 or 2 steps, foot coming down on the step before the one that reached the base.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
How can F3 be a step or so farther away from 1st, but touch a foot to the base as the BR passed?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Easily - because BR slowed down due to the OBS by F4, and F3 caught up with BR right at (and slightly before they touched) first base.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
OP stated F3 fielded the ball and BACKS toward the base. And would still like to know where it happened. That does make a difference.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
I guess I didn't remember the "a step or so closer to HP than BR" part correctly. F3 must have been slightly ahead of the BR. Are you trying to figure out if the delay of the BR was caused by F3 with the ball; pretty sure it was not because F3 was inside the line and the BR and F4 were on foul side. Anyway, my main question is confirming that a fielder can obstruct even if past the base the R/BR is running to.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
The simple answer to just that is absolutely.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
How many times have you seen the runner have contact with F3 just past 1B or F6 just past 2B?
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
past fed rule changes | rcwilco | Basketball | 5 | Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:24pm |
quarterback past the L.o.s | MRD | Football | 8 | Mon Aug 28, 2006 12:50pm |
The turn past 1st | tgranillo | Baseball | 8 | Thu Apr 20, 2006 03:29pm |
This past season. | brandan89 | Basketball | 4 | Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:31am |
"Three times past the hip" | TwoBits | Softball | 1 | Wed May 01, 2002 12:46pm |