The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 08, 2012, 08:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont, NH
Posts: 1,352
ASA Test question for FP

I would like an explanation of the following ASA test question:

8. (FP ONLY) With R1on first base and B2 in the batter’s box with a count of 1-ball and 1-strike, B2 takes a called strike as R1attempts to steal second base. Out of frustration on the called strike, B2 accidentally drops the bat as F2 makes a play on R1. As F2 steps forward on the throw F2 trips over the bat and cannot complete the throw. The plate umpire calls a “dead ball,” rules B2 out and returns R1 to first base.

Reading through this question the first pass through the test, I had marked it as "True". I had the reference of Rule 7.6.Q:

"When actively hindering the catcher while in the batter's box."



But then I checked the Rule Supplement, 33.B which actually contains very similar wording to the above question:

Batter interference occurs while the batter is at bat and before the ball is batted. It occurs in fast pitch when the batter interferes with the catcher’s throw on an attempted steal or when the batter interferes with the catcher on a play at the plate. The batter’s box is not a sanctuary for the batter when a play is being made at the plate. Interference could also occur when a batter releases the bat in a manner that it hits the catcher and prevents them from making a play. If the batter merely drops the bat and the catcher trips over it, there is no interference. Batter interference is also described in RS #24B.

So I thought this was a question where ASA wanted to know who was reading the book.

Please explain to me how this question is not "False" given the wording in the rule supplement.

Thanx.
__________________
Ted
USA & NFHS Softball
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 08, 2012, 08:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Here's my opinion.

The wording in the rule supplement refers to a batter becoming a batter-runner, and legally dropping the bat to run. That didn't happen here.

There is no reason to absolve a batter from interfering with an action that has no legitimate part of the batting action, even if accidental. She did it, it interfered, she pays the price.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 08, 2012, 08:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 746
ONE OF THE UIC'S PLEASE POST THE ANSWER OR PM ME. I HAVE ALREADY TURNED IN MY TEST. I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.

THANKS. sorry about the caps

i was thinkinng the same as steve but now we know for certain (99%)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Apr 08, 2012, 10:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru_in_Blu View Post



But then I checked the Rule Supplement, 33.B which actually contains very similar wording to the above question:

Batter interference occurs while the batter is at bat and before the ball is batted. It occurs in fast pitch when the batter interferes with the catcher’s throw on an attempted steal or when the batter interferes with the catcher on a play at the plate. The batter’s box is not a sanctuary for the batter when a play is being made at the plate. Interference could also occur when a batter releases the bat in a manner that it hits the catcher and prevents them from making a play. If the batter merely drops the bat and the catcher trips over it, there is no interference. Batter interference is also described in RS #24B.

So I thought this was a question where ASA wanted to know who was reading the book.

Please explain to me how this question is not "False" given the wording in the rule supplement.

Thanx.
RS #52 may also be appropriate as it refers to discarding the bat in a manner which interferes with the catcher's ability to make a play.

Remember, this is not a BR and should not be discarding the bat, so the catcher should not have to play around it.

Ron, "true"
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Apr 09, 2012, 08:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 746
thanks, Mike. that is what i put without giving it much thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FED Test Question 68 Wisscott Basketball 2 Thu Nov 09, 2006 07:38am
NJ Test Question PAT THE REF Baseball 2 Thu Apr 27, 2006 02:07pm
Test Question #40 golfdesigner Basketball 24 Wed Oct 20, 2004 07:47am
test question 25 zac Basketball 21 Mon Oct 11, 2004 03:26pm
asa test question #39 coreyboy Softball 3 Sat Mar 27, 2004 10:06am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:33pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1