The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2004, 04:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 10
The answer on that ? is B but I do not agree with that answer in the rule book rule 8section b 1a an obstructed runner may not be called out between the bases where obstructed unless appealed for missing a base so why is the answer B, please explain
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2004, 06:13pm
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
The key to understanding this question (at least it satisfied me) is "R1 would not have made it home had obstruction not occured." If you have R1 protected, in your judgement, protected to where?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 26, 2004, 07:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
The phrase "may not be called out between the bases where obstructed" does not mean must advance.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Mar 27, 2004, 10:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by coreyboy
The answer on that ? is B but I do not agree with that answer in the rule book rule 8section b 1a an obstructed runner may not be called out between the bases where obstructed unless appealed for missing a base so why is the answer B, please explain

The answer is "B" because when R1 (obstructed runner) is put out, the ball becomes dead. When there is a dead ball, all baserunners must be permitted to fulfill their baserunning duties prior to acknowledging any appeals. Since R1 is standing on 3rd, it would be a bit ludicrous to accept an appeal for a runner missing the base to which they have legally advanced and is standing upon.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1