![]() |
|
|
|||
One that is directed to a fielder at, or near, first base such that there is a reasonable expectation that the throw is catchable and that it would have recorded an out.
A throw that sails over the fielder, out of her reach, would not be considered as a "quality throw". |
|
|||
Quote:
As my old sergeant said if wish to live long enough to see tomorrow you will assume nothing. That goes double for umpiring. But if you wish to use assume logic then bend over and spread them because you are about to get your assumed. |
|
|||
Quote:
Then why "Game Over"? ![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Because the game winning run scored.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
I guess that the first post does imply that...which I had conveniently forgot about by the time I'd read through another twenty posts.
|
|
|||
Either way, the BR would have hindered the receiving fielder.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
The play involves a running lane violation, not interefering with a thrown ball.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3' running lane violation on BB? | PSUchem | Softball | 51 | Tue Nov 24, 2009 01:20pm |
Running lane violation? | David Emerling | Baseball | 25 | Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:38am |
Running lane | grimjack5150 | Softball | 7 | Sat May 10, 2008 10:51pm |
ASA - running lane violation with a walk | Dakota | Softball | 34 | Thu Sep 25, 2003 09:57am |
running lane violation | Rachel | Softball | 4 | Thu Jul 10, 2003 09:03pm |