![]() |
|
|||
|
I would like to see something in writing that says "the manner in which umpires ruled on most plays was not to change." I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but I never saw anything like that. Additionally, that would be inconsistent with "comment" to the rule changes, which reads, "Removes 'intentionally' from the rule and allows the umpire to judge interference and not intent." As so many on this forum point out, the language in the book is clear so how could we enforce the rule differently? Thoughts?
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Test Question | Pirate | Basketball | 6 | Sun Nov 01, 2009 01:20pm |
| Test question help | zac | Basketball | 16 | Sat Oct 31, 2009 08:35am |
| Test Question #40 | golfdesigner | Basketball | 24 | Wed Oct 20, 2004 07:47am |
| test question 25 | zac | Basketball | 21 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 03:26pm |
| Test Question #29 | garote | Basketball | 1 | Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:06pm |