View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 25, 2012, 06:51pm
EsqUmp EsqUmp is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 763
I would like to see something in writing that says "the manner in which umpires ruled on most plays was not to change." I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but I never saw anything like that. Additionally, that would be inconsistent with "comment" to the rule changes, which reads, "Removes 'intentionally' from the rule and allows the umpire to judge interference and not intent." As so many on this forum point out, the language in the book is clear so how could we enforce the rule differently? Thoughts?
Reply With Quote