![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Not only is it not INT, it's also not illegal, either. A runner may certainly physically assist another runner. In fact, they're the only person(s) allowed to physically assist another runner while the ball is still live.
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
Ahh, the art of test taking.
![]() So another way of testing the umpire's knowledge of rules could be: Interference is ruled when a runner physically assists another runner. True or False
__________________
Tony |
|
|||
C is not interference either unless the runner intentionally interferes with the thrown ball or is out of the running lane, and that information is not given as part of the possible answer.
As usual, the FED test has a couple of questions that have problems. Last edited by RKBUmp; Sun Jan 22, 2012 at 03:18pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
And you could argue A is not because ball may have already passed another infielder. But your point about the way the question is written is well-taken.
__________________
Tony |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Test Question | Pirate | Basketball | 6 | Sun Nov 01, 2009 01:20pm |
Test question help | zac | Basketball | 16 | Sat Oct 31, 2009 08:35am |
Test Question #40 | golfdesigner | Basketball | 24 | Wed Oct 20, 2004 07:47am |
test question 25 | zac | Basketball | 21 | Mon Oct 11, 2004 03:26pm |
Test Question #29 | garote | Basketball | 1 | Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:06pm |