The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 24, 2011, 03:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Desoto, TX
Posts: 254
Proposed NCAA rule changes

The DDB on leaving early doesn't seem to be a bad idea imo.

Quote:
NCAA Softball Rules Committee Proposes Change on Early Base Departures
06/23/11 - Special Release

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. - The NCAA Softball Rules Committee at its meeting earlier this month in Oklahoma City recommended a “delayed dead ball” in cases when a runner leave a base before a pitch is thrown.

Umpires will still signal that the runner left the base early, but the play will continue. The defense would then be allowed to choose the result of the play, or it could opt to have the runner called out and the count would return to what it was on the hitter before the pitch was thrown.

For example, if the hitter lined into a double play, the defense could choose to take the two outs. Previously if a runner left a base early, the play was considered immediately dead and the pitch didn’t count.

“This is designed to advantage the defense regardless of the situation,” said Dee Abrahamson, the secretary-rules editor for softball. “It can now enforce the traditional effect of the out and the batter returning to the box, or the result of the play, whichever they prefer.”

All rules changes must be approved by the NCAA Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which next meets via conference call July 13.

In other action, the committee agreed to set predetermined dates for bat manufacturers to make any changes to their approved bat lists. Dates for the 2012 season are Jan. 15, March 15, April 15 and June 15.

The approved bat list for the 2011 season was released Jan. 1 but was amended several times throughout the season.

It was also the first time mandatory regular-season softball barrel compression testing went into effect. Mandatory barrel compression testing took place in select regular-season tournaments in all three divisions in 2011. Postseason bat testing, including post-competition testing, also was conducted.

A portable barrel compression testing machine was used to conduct the pre-competition tests. The machines are about the size of a radar gun. Bats that pass the test, which can be conducted in a matter of seconds, had a sticker placed on them so umpires knew the bat had been tested.

In 2012, coaches will be required to provide to the umpires before the game a printed copy of the current NCAA Approved Softball Bat List with all of their team’s bat models to be used in the game highlighted and the number of bats of each model indicated in the appropriate column on the list. The list will be used to conduct the umpires’ pregame bat inspection.

The committee also discussed cases when it is ruled that a pitch was intentionally thrown at a batter or an umpire. In these instances, immediate ejections could occur or warnings could be issued to the offending pitcher and catcher. Both coaches would also receive warnings.

If the violation occurs again, the offending pitcher and catcher will be ejected from the game. The coach could also be ejected if the umpire deems it appropriate. Previously, the rule applied to batters being intentionally hit by a pitch and only the pitcher and coach were ejected.

In addition, the committee is asking teams to experiment using a softball model that has .52 coefficient of restitution/300 compression for the fall nontraditional season so it can receive feedback on how the ball plays in competition.

The new model ball, which is available through five different manufacturers, is less temperature sensitive and has a lower severity index when striking a player than the .47 COR/350 compression softballs used currently.

In other actions, the committee also approved the following:

- A batter hit by a pitch in the batter’s box will not be required to attempt to get out of the way of the pitch in order to be awarded first base.
Brick backstops and brick home-run fences will be required to be padded by the 2016 season.

- Host teams must provide 12 softballs, two of which need to be brand new, before a game begins. Previously, the host teams had to provide five softballs for a game. The rationale for the proposed change is to make more softballs available for game play to help the flow of the game.

- The committee reiterated that all lines on the playing field, the pitcher’s plate, home plate and the three bases shall be white, which would disallow the use of colors for special tributes. The playing field lines shall be marked before each game, including the second game of a double header and each game of a tournament.

- The group also reaffirmed that the effect for an illegal pitch should remain a ball on the batter and baserunners advancing one base. The committee considered several alternatives, including warnings and not advancing the runner but, in the end, the group agreed to maintain the current penalty.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 24, 2011, 08:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by okla21fan View Post
The DDB on leaving early doesn't seem to be a bad idea imo.
Gotta think about that one for a while.

Sort of curious why they would wait five years to mandate brick surfaces be padded. Hell, even NASCAR acted faster than that and is of a much more traditional hard-headedness than the NCAA

Like the idea of testing the 52/300. If this works out with some positive feedback, look for all games to move to the ball by 2013 and many of the non-approved bats returning to both games.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 27, 2011, 10:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
Wouldn't suprise me if DDB on leaving early passes. It would then quickly trickle down into ASA, NFHS, and other rules sets.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 29, 2011, 03:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,362
Personally, I feel as though the DDB on leaving the base early is tilting the advantage to the defense.

If a runner actually leaves early because of a misstep, or because of mistiming, why should you offer the defense a chance to make two outs, or more? It makes no sense. Punish the infraction and get on with it.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 29, 2011, 04:21pm
Moderator M-800
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi View Post
Personally, I feel as though the DDB on leaving the base early is tilting the advantage to the defense.

If a runner actually leaves early because of a misstep, or because of mistiming, why should you offer the defense a chance to make two outs, or more? It makes no sense. Punish the infraction and get on with it.
Why should the offense get the advantage from it's infraction when the batter hits an easy double play ball on a pitch where the runner left early?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 29, 2011, 06:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,560
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Why should the offense get the advantage from it's infraction when the batter hits an easy double play ball on a pitch where the runner left early?
What advantage would the offense get? If you want to take that mentality, maybe INT should be a DDB, also. For that matter, let's make everything a DDB just in case. Oooopppss, forgot this

Personally, I understand why they are looking at this as a possible change, but I honestly believe that will just provide that much more confusion and an increase in the coach's BS meter trying to talk umpires into a load of crap rulings, even at the college level.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Sat Jul 02, 2011 at 04:57pm.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 01, 2011, 06:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
Why should the offense get the advantage from it's infraction when the batter hits an easy double play ball on a pitch where the runner left early?

Under the current rule, how will the offense get any advantage, or for that matter even be able hit the ball??? The current rule states that when the runner leaves early, it is a no pitch (nothing else can happen, dead ball...etc.) and the runner is out. That seems more than enough punishment for the infraction, at least to me.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed NCAA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 14 Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:13am
Proposed ASA Rule Changes #1 IRISHMAFIA Softball 107 Thu Nov 06, 2008 02:14am
Proposed Rule Changes, ASA? IRISHMAFIA Softball 47 Fri Sep 07, 2007 01:36pm
Proposed ASA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 8 Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm
Proposed Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 22 Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1