The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 08, 2003, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
WestMichBlue,

I think you may be mis-remembering the FED POE on the 3-foot lane. The POE simply said that the BR had to use the lane on a walk as well as a batted ball. It did nothing to redefine or define the means by which a BR may interfere. In fact, the POE uses the same wording, "When the BR runs outside the 3 foot lane and, in the judgement of the umpire, interferes with the fielder receiving the throw at 1st base, interference shall be called."

As far as a runner on 2nd interfering with F6 on a batted ball, my method of ruling is this: If the runner simply runs from 2nd to 3rd and cleanly passes in front of F6, then I would not rule interference even if F6 muffs the ball. By "cleanly passing" I mean that F6 did not alter her path to the ball due to the presence of the runner.

SamC
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1