The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 09:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maryland (northeast of Baltimore)
Posts: 371
catcher head covering

Fed rules but others would be helpful. How do handle/interpret the idea of a catcher wearing a cloth head covering under her helmet while catching? Not a bandanna, just plain cloth. Potentially a violation of 3-2-5 but... . Do you see it as a uniform violation? Do you care? Is it different from allowing prewrap as a headband even though that's not really what it is? And what if it was a skull cap? Is that any better? And while we're at it, what makes a bandanna a bandanna? The design? The color?

These things have come up recently between umps and coaches and I'm straddling the fence. I personally don't care unless it is "bandanna" related (gang colors??), and even then I find it to be something I enforce because I'm told to. I wrote my state interpreter today and I'd like to throw it out to you guys. What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Jimmy View Post
Fed rules but others would be helpful. How do handle/interpret the idea of a catcher wearing a cloth head covering under her helmet while catching? Not a bandanna, just plain cloth. Potentially a violation of 3-2-5 but... . Do you see it as a uniform violation? Do you care? Is it different from allowing prewrap as a headband even though that's not really what it is? And what if it was a skull cap? Is that any better? And while we're at it, what makes a bandanna a bandanna? The design? The color?

These things have come up recently between umps and coaches and I'm straddling the fence. I personally don't care unless it is "bandanna" related (gang colors??), and even then I find it to be something I enforce because I'm told to. I wrote my state interpreter today and I'd like to throw it out to you guys. What do you think?
as "just plain cloth"
Not allowed if it has a knot, is a violation of school uniform colors (3-2-7), is "brightly colored" (bandanna definition), or interferes with the safe wearing of the helmet.
Probably to be ignored.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 10:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
NCAA...Not allowed.
13.1.1.3 HEADGEAR....."bandannas and handkerchiefs are not allowable headgear even if covered or worn under a cap or helmet."
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 12:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJUmp View Post
NCAA...Not allowed.
13.1.1.3 HEADGEAR....."bandannas and handkerchiefs are not allowable headgear even if covered or worn under a cap or helmet."
Wow, and I thought I was anal Okay, I heard all that laughing!

If I cannot see it, how do I know it is there? And no, I'm not going to go looking for it.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
...If I cannot see it, how do I know it is there? And no, I'm not going to go looking for it.
No worries... the opposing coach will be sure to point it out!
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 12:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little Jimmy View Post
Fed rules but others would be helpful. How do handle/interpret the idea of a catcher wearing a cloth head covering under her helmet while catching? Not a bandanna, just plain cloth. Potentially a violation of 3-2-5 but... . Do you see it as a uniform violation? Do you care? Is it different from allowing prewrap as a headband even though that's not really what it is? And what if it was a skull cap? Is that any better? And while we're at it, what makes a bandanna a bandanna? The design? The color?

These things have come up recently between umps and coaches and I'm straddling the fence. I personally don't care unless it is "bandanna" related (gang colors??), and even then I find it to be something I enforce because I'm told to. I wrote my state interpreter today and I'd like to throw it out to you guys. What do you think?
As far as I am concerned, anything worn under the helmet is not headgear, just as anything worn under the jersey is not a jersey. In each case, we have described an undergarment.

If the undergarment is exposed, it must meet the requirements of THAT rule (3-2-7). If the undergarment is not exposed, it has no more restrictions than the player's underwear.

Before someone points out that the helmet mask being removed does expose the undergarment, I would add that there are times that other undergarments intended to be unexposed also can become exposed at times. That doesn't mean we must regulate that item as part of the uniform. I mean, how many times has a catcher's crouch exposed her ........ Let some other OOO make that call.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maryland (northeast of Baltimore)
Posts: 371
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post

Before someone points out that the helmet mask being removed does expose the undergarment, I would add that there are times that other undergarments intended to be unexposed also can become exposed at times. That doesn't mean we must regulate that item as part of the uniform. I mean, how many times has a catcher's crouch exposed her ........ Let some other OOO make that call.

I like that train of thought. I think I could hang my hat on that one.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 3 hrs east of the western time zone
Posts: 895
LJ -

I think we need to let that one go..............

There are bigger fish to fry !!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 03:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
I see no cloth. Too what are you referring?

PS - are we ALL going to misspell bandana?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 04:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Wow, and I thought I was anal Okay, I heard all that laughing!

If I cannot see it, how do I know it is there? And no, I'm not going to go looking for it.
Me either.
Only point I was trying to make was that their rule set leaves no question as to whether or not the type of head coverings discussed in the OP are allowed.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 06:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
I see no cloth. Too what are you referring?

PS - are we ALL going to misspell bandana?
ban·dan·na [ ban dánnə ] (plural ban·dan·nas) or ban·dan·a [ ban dánnə ] (plural ban·dan·as)


noun

Definition:

bright cotton scarf: a large square of brightly colored cotton or silk cloth worn over the hair or around the neck


[Mid-18th century. Probably via Portuguese< Hindi bāndhnū, method of tie-dyeing < bāndhnā "to tie"]
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 19, 2011, 07:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
I see no cloth. Too what are you referring?

PS - are we ALL going to misspell bandana?
Could have been worse. How many ways is there to offer Kippah or kipah or kipa or kippa? Then again it could have been yamaka, yarmlke, yarmulke, yarmulka, yarmelke and maybe even kapel
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Catcher covering third base bas2456 Baseball 29 Fri Jun 11, 2010 06:45am
Covering for another Amesman Basketball 7 Thu Jan 08, 2009 01:23pm
Covering Downfield Ed Hickland Football 4 Thu Jul 24, 2008 07:59am
plate ump covering 3rd ggk Baseball 26 Wed Apr 05, 2006 02:27pm
BU covering home? WestMichiganBlue Softball 14 Mon Aug 15, 2005 02:24pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:59pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1