2011 ASA Rule Changes with Comments

[AtlUmpSteve]

I would certainly believe the intent is identical to every other "appeal" or option situation; batting out of order, using an illegal glove, catcher's obstruction, etc. If discovered 1) while at bat, fixed with no penalty, if discovered 2) after completing the at bat but before a next pitch to a succeeding batter, the option, or if discovered 3) after completing the at bat but after a next pitch to a succeeding batter, play stands.

[BretMan]

This new rule creates a true "appeal" situation (ie: it cannot be ruled upon until brought to the umpire's attention). Will it be added to the all-inclusive list of appeal plays in the Rules Supplement?

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

I would certainly believe the intent is identical to every other "appeal" or option situation; batting out of order, using an illegal glove, catcher's obstruction, etc. If discovered 1) while at bat, fixed with no penalty, if discovered 2) after completing the at bat but before a next pitch to a succeeding batter, the option, or if discovered 3) after completing the at bat but after a next pitch to a succeeding batter, play stands.

Originally Posted by BretMan

This new rule creates a true "appeal" situation (ie: it cannot be ruled upon until brought to the umpire's attention). Will it be added to the all-inclusive list of appeal plays in the Rules Supplement?

I completely agree with Steve, just think we are going to see many different variations on the field and a load of excuses. Personally, I don't think the rule is necessary and have never had an issue with it.

And if a see a team set up improperly, I'm going to correct them.