![]() |
|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
The talking heads in the game went on at length, for many innings, that the umpires aren't supposed to call the IP if the pitcher does not gain an advantage. Even said that was the rule. Spent some time lamenting that the umpires were affecting the game.
![]() Even though the 'heads' said the Fla pitchers were not gaining an advantage by leaping the slomos showed both pitchers landing with their left foot on the circle chalk! Do you think being 2-4 feet closer to the batter and a slightly higher pitch speed would be an advantage? Last edited by FullCount; Thu Jun 03, 2010 at 09:14pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Granted, I have been jumping back and forth between programs, but I heard them talk about the umpires being directed to actually see the IP and then call it, not guess on presumption. They also noted that the IPs were clearly IPs. I must have missed the part to which you are referring.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Heard some of that in the AZ/Tenn game but didn't hear it in the Fla game. I was working while listening and trying to watch some. Most of what I heard about not calling th IP unless there was an advantage came in the first 2 innings but still came back to it later in the game. Late in the last inning they said that there were two three-run HRs but that the real story in the game was the IP. Huh?
|
|
|||
Quote:
just sayin |
|
|||
Could someone post up a copy/paste of the rule....?
If it doesn't mention gaining an advantage.....I'm wondering why everyone keeps referencing it (including the announcers...as I did watch the game). If it does mention it....I'm wondering what advantage she is/was gaining. Thanks. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
NCAA Publications - 2010-2011 Women's Softball Rules (2 Year Publication) Online NOW As for the rule look at 10.4.4 No leaping is allowed. The pitcher may not become airborne on the initial drive from the pitcher’s plate. The pivot foot must slide/drag on the ground. That won't tell you an iota of how umpires have been asked to enforce this rule, but I think the other posters are doing a pretty good job of that.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn... |
|
|||
Quote:
FullCount-It is not ball speed but batter reaction time. The Florida Pitcher was subtracting at least a foot or two from the batters' time to see the ball when she leaped. |
|
|||
Yeah I understand about reaction time- hence my note about being a few feet closer to the batter. I also heard one of the heads say several times that leaping is a disadvantage but I also know that there are several schools of pitching styles that firmly believe you gain speed by leaping. Regardless of your belief, the pitchers leap because they think it does gain them an advantage. If it didn't they wouldn't do it. I kept waiting yesterday to hear someone to make that very point. I'm still waiting.
|
|
|||
Quote:
These THs are really all over the place on the issue, but then again, they really have no idea of what they are talking about.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Larry |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WCWS umpire head movement | shipwreck | Softball | 12 | Thu Jun 04, 2009 09:53am |
WCWS Umpires? | Dholloway1962 | Softball | 33 | Mon May 18, 2009 11:47am |
Crafty cheating coach | crewumpires | Baseball | 25 | Tue May 27, 2008 06:19pm |
Coach Caught Cheating | stripes | Basketball | 1 | Wed Nov 30, 2005 01:26pm |
WCWS - Umpires | PublicBJ | Softball | 10 | Wed Jun 15, 2005 08:08am |