skipping your time at bat

[KJUmp]

Originally Posted by tmielke

If the team that is supposed to bat stays on defense and the team that is supposed to be on defense stays in the dug out waiting for you to allow them to bat again who forfeits?

I'll throw it back to you...what would you do?

I've already stated my position pretty clearly...the team that refused to bat when it was their turn to bat loses the game by forfeit.

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

I'll throw it back to you...what would you do?

I've already stated my position pretty clearly...the team that refused to bat when it was their turn to bat loses the game by forfeit.

I don't have much of answer other than telling them they can't do that, refusing to participate in their sham, and reporting it to the state association; and let the administrators decide how to treat the score, game and schools.

I challenge how you could declare a forfeit for failing to bat when there is no team on the field preparing to play defense. Here is a case where you must have an egg to make an egg sandwich (there has to be a pitch to bat, and there has to be a pitcher to make a pitch, as well as the rules requiring 9 defensive players, 8 of whom must be present in fair territory to have a legal pitch).

[LIIRISHMAN]

In a 24-0 JV game there is "no game". JV for much of the country are an instructional tool used by coaches and schools to prepare players for the varsity level.I'd be the first one to agree in an varsity game there are no "rule
adjustments" but when officiating an 24-0 game commonsense should prevail.

[shagpal]

if there is "no game", there needs to be no more need for an official. it's called practice if that's what both teams wish to continue, and the official has already done his job to get paid for both teams. time for a forfeit, there's nothing else left to play out. that's your common sense, go home, and have dinner.

Originally Posted by LIIRISHMAN

In a 24-0 JV game there is "no game". JV for much of the country are an instructional tool used by coaches and schools to prepare players for the varsity level.I'd be the first one to agree in an varsity game there are no "rule
adjustments" but when officiating an 24-0 game commonsense should prevail.

[shagpal]

if you don't have much either, then what you have is a wish sandwich, and you wish you had some meat, baow baow baow....

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

I don't have much of answer other than telling them they can't do that, refusing to participate in their sham, and reporting it to the state association; and let the administrators decide how to treat the score, game and schools.

I challenge how you could declare a forfeit for failing to bat when there is no team on the field preparing to play defense. Here is a case where you must have an egg to make an egg sandwich (there has to be a pitch to bat, and there has to be a pitcher to make a pitch, as well as the rules requiring 9 defensive players, 8 of whom must be present in fair territory to have a legal pitch).

[KJUmp]

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

I don't have much of answer other than telling them they can't do that, refusing to participate in their sham, and reporting it to the state association; and let the administrators decide how to treat the score, game and schools.

I challenge how you could declare a forfeit for failing to bat when there is no team on the field preparing to play defense. Here is a case where you must have an egg to make an egg sandwich (there has to be a pitch to bat, and there has to be a pitcher to make a pitch, as well as the rules requiring 9 defensive players, 8 of whom must be present in fair territory to have a legal pitch).

Great line Steve!
OK...I think we're all in agreement with what you said in your first paragraph if this sitch occurred in a HS (V/JV/Fr) game. We're not going to let the team do that, game is over at that point, higher authorities make the decision as to the official result of the game. They can call it whatever they want, we really don't care....not our worry.

So let's say we're working a non HS, or a non tournament game like a house league or rec league game. Same sitch as the OP. Team A is on defense, they're getting crushed by Team B. Team A records the 3rd out to end the half inning, and HC of A tells his team to stay out in their defensive positions as the HC tells you "we want to forgo our time at bat, and let Team B bat again, and we'll continue to play defense."

PU: "Coach you can't do that."
HC/A: But we want to...and the HC of B is OK with us doing it."

At this point what do we have? Many good arguments have been made as to why you cannot declare the game a forfeit. and I can see where the points made are certainly valid...but then what is this bizzaro sitch considered by rule?

I'm ready to be swayed to the other side of the debate.

[Andy]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

Great line Steve!
OK...I think we're all in agreement with what you said in your first paragraph if this sitch occurred in a HS (V/JV/Fr) game. We're not going to let the team do that, game is over at that point, higher authorities make the decision as to the official result of the game. They can call it whatever they want, we really don't care....not our worry.

So let's say we're working a non HS, or a non tournament game like a house league or rec league game. Same sitch as the OP. Team A is on defense, they're getting crushed by Team B. Team A records the 3rd out to end the half inning, and HC of A tells his team to stay out in their defensive positions as the HC tells you "we want to forgo our time at bat, and let Team B bat again, and we'll continue to play defense."

PU: "Coach you can't do that."
HC/A: But we want to...and the HC of B is OK with us doing it."

At this point what do we have? Many good arguments have been made as to why you cannot declare the game a forfeit. and I can see where the points made are certainly valid...but then what is this bizzaro sitch considered by rule?

I'm ready to be swayed to the other side of the debate.

Even a house league or rec league has some type of authority structure. If team A refuses to bat, stop the game, file a report with the league and let them deal with it. Unless, of course, the league has put in guidelines or rules addressing this situation....

[KJUmp]

Originally Posted by Andy

Even a house league or rec league has some type of authority structure. If team A refuses to bat, stop the game, file a report with the league and let them deal with it. Unless, of course, the league has put in guidelines or rules addressing this situation....

We've covered that aspect of the sitch already...no disagreement that these would be the appropriate steps to follow.

The question posed is what specific book rule applies here. I've stated that I felt that any rule code's forfeit rule would apply here. Many posters have been of the opinion that the rules covering forfeits cannot be applied here. The reasons they have stated have made me rethink my position to the point of my thinking to myself..."OK, I think you're right. It probably does meet the rule book criteria for a forfeit. So, if it's not a forfeit, what is it considered by rule?"

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

We've covered that aspect of the sitch already...no disagreement that these would be the appropriate steps to follow.

The question posed is what specific book rule applies here. I've stated that I felt that any rule code's forfeit rule would apply here. Many posters have been of the opinion that the rules covering forfeits cannot be applied here. The reasons they have stated have made me rethink my position to the point of my thinking to myself..."OK, I think you're right. It probably does meet the rule book criteria for a forfeit. So, if it's not a forfeit, what is it considered by rule?"

KJ, you're right on the verge, man. I challenged your decision that the team refusing to bat was the team that forfeits; but I agree its IS a forfeit.

I'm not the administrative body, but, absent a local rule allowing (what we used to call a) "flip-flop", if it were my call, I would declare a double forfeit if neither team was willing to take the next position required by rule.

[Andy]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

We've covered that aspect of the sitch already...no disagreement that these would be the appropriate steps to follow.

The question posed is what specific book rule applies here. I've stated that I felt that any rule code's forfeit rule would apply here. Many posters have been of the opinion that the rules covering forfeits cannot be applied here. The reasons they have stated have made me rethink my position to the point of my thinking to myself..."OK, I think you're right. It probably does meet the rule book criteria for a forfeit. So, if it's not a forfeit, what is it considered by rule?"

What I'm saying is that as the umpire....you don't declare anything.

Neither team wants to play...leave the field...file the report...let the league authorities decide the status of the game....

[CecilOne]

Does anyone know of any rule set that allows the team ahead to skip a turn at bat so that the slaughter rule inning will be reached in less time?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by KJUmp

I'll throw it back to you...what would you do?

I've already stated my position pretty clearly...the team that refused to bat when it was their turn to bat loses the game by forfeit.

Well, think it all the way through. How are they refusing to bat? The pitcher is never "ready" - so no pitch ever started. Seems to me the other team is just as "guilty" of not playing as the leading team.

That said, there's nothing worse than the 14-0 in the 2nd inning game where the leading team gets on base and steps off on purpose to get out. To me, that shows up the other team WAY more than simply saying, "We don't need to bat this inning."