![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Yes we do.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Larry |
|
|||
Quote:
________ TopJoy. Last edited by youngump; Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 07:14pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
First, I'm not an NCAA expert either, I had my books handy when I saw the OP, found it an interesting sitch, and looked at it from the perspective that if it happened in a college game, how would I have handled it, referencing the applicable NCAAA rule number. My point to the poster about the dead ball not being pertinent to the sitch is this...when the run scored the game was over. Home team is jumping around, high fiving each other thinking that they won. At that moment the rule book definition of a completed game had been satisfied. Because the game is over the ball is dead. To illustrate it another way, say the batter hits a home run over the fence. When the ball cleared the fence it became, by rule, a dead ball. The offensive player in the OP who threw the ball into the dugout did not cause the ball to become a dead ball. it already was a dead ball by virtue of the home run. Hence, her actions have no bearing on the play. There is no base award given to any of the runners or the batter runner because she threw the ball into the dugout. As Irish pointed out in his initial reply to OP.....(paraphrasing here)....'we don't need the ball.' Our concern on the field as a crew is: 1. Did the runner on 1st complete her base running obligation to touch 2nd after the BR got her base hit that scored the runner from 3rd? 2. Did the defensive team satisfy the rule requirements for a proper appeal? |
|
|||
Good point Mike, clever how those NCAA devils wrote that rule.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
I disagree that the game is over and or that the ball is dead when the runner touches home. To illustrate, lets change the situation slightly: Lets say that runner on third is running on the release of the pitch. Lets say that the runner from first is very slow. Lets say that the "hit" is a slow gorund ball to F6. Its likely that R1 would (or certainly could) reach home while F6 is still in the process of fielding the ball and throwing to F4 for a forceout. Noone would suggest that the game is over (or conditionally over) or that the ball is dead when the runner touches home. From a prcatical point, this is the play in the original post. By the way, I'm not questioning the outcome or the ruling - only stating that the game nor the play ends when R1 touches home. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When the obvious call isn't the right call | Don Mueller | Baseball | 28 | Mon Aug 20, 2007 01:46am |
The right call or the correct call? | Nevadaref | Basketball | 9 | Mon Dec 11, 2006 10:21am |
ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 28 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm |
To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
More Pacers/Pistons call/no call | OverAndBack | Basketball | 36 | Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm |