![]() |
|
|
|||
NFHS case study Rule 8 Page 49. Ruling, If the umpire judges that the batter-runner interfered with a legitimate play by the catcher, she should be called out.
My question is how would this be considered a legitimate play? The batter-runner received a base on balls and is entitled to 1st base without liability to be put out. Im not sure I see a legitimate reason for the catcher to be throwing to 1st, especially with a runner on 3rd. Based on the video, however, I see a real potential for a coach to abuse the rule to try and get a free out. Dont have an ASA case study book and dont see anything regarding a walk and running lane violation in the rules supplements. Last edited by RKBUmp; Sun Nov 01, 2009 at 11:43pm. |
|
|||
RKBUmp if you will please note the comment listed with Rule 8 on page 49...8.2.5 SITUATION B:
COMMENT: All bases must be run legally, even awarded bases. So a award of a walk ( base on balls) is not a free pass to first base... There is still liability to be put out... Same in ASA... A walk is still a live ball situation... |
|
|||
I realize that it states the bases must be run legally, but, it also states there must be a legitimate play. There is no play on a walked batter at 1st base until they pass the base and turn toward 2nd, so F3 has no reason to be setup on the bag.
Merely being out of the lane and getting hit by the ball is not automatically interference. Was there a play? Was the throw on target and catchable? Did the catcher try to bean the BR on purpose? |
|
|||
Quote:
Some coaches assume that if they can lock down runner on 1B and F3 has relatively short throw home then R1 on 3B will retreat, but reality is that F3's throw to 3B is long and R1 has no reason to not continue to lead off until ball is returned to the pitcher. |
|
|||
I'm not there to supplement crappy defense... so I'd have to really see int.
So .. probably nothing from me unless there really was an act of int which did not include simply trotting to 1b while a catcher makes a bad throw.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
|
|||
Seems to me there's plenty of opinion to go 'round on this topic ... and a lot of it seems to be in direct violation of the rules.
Whether or not a defense is, in our opinion, making a smart play, or not, has no bearing on this play whatsoever. The rules are the rules. If the BR is out of the running lane and she interferes with the throw, she is out. Another instance where a defense may throw to first is late in the game with a one-run lead or a tie. You have to let the defense play defense. And the offense is obligated to play within the rules. Remember, the running lane starts 30' from home, so the likelihood is the throw is made prior to the BR getting to the lane. |
|
|||
The definitions section defines what a play is. If the throw, as stated earlier, is to keep the runner from continuing to 2nd rather than recording an out, I'm not sure it meets the criteria of a play. There is no out at 1B while the BR is on his/her way there. I would have nothing.
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
3' lane, 3' running lane, running lane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Running lane violation? | David Emerling | Baseball | 25 | Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:38am |
The Running Lane | tcblue13 | Softball | 21 | Sun Jul 15, 2007 01:46pm |
30' Running Lane | bobbrix | Softball | 16 | Mon Mar 08, 2004 12:20am |
ASA - running lane violation with a walk | Dakota | Softball | 34 | Thu Sep 25, 2003 09:57am |
running lane violation | Rachel | Softball | 4 | Thu Jul 10, 2003 09:03pm |