The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Nov 04, 2008, 10:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
You would allow a crash without the ball, but you wouldn't allow the crash with the ball
The defender should not be there without the ball.

Quote:

Just to make sure we are on the same page. A defender is standing anywhere (nowhere near the runner's path) and the runner alters their route to crash into that player for whatever reason. Or maybe a player is a little too close to the basepath and the runner decides s/he is going to teach that player a lesson or is just being an ***, and plows that player over.
A runner altering their route to plow a defender is USC.

Look at this one, F6 is standing in a position, runner crashes her.

I am to expect a runner to slide at the 30' mark between the bases?

A catcher is 15' up the line without the ball? Runner slide?

Quote:
Even to the point of USC, you have no problem with that? BTW, there is no discretion being taken away from anyone.
No, I dont have a problem with it to the point of USC. Why should I?

I believe the proposed change most certainly removes discretion. I know it when I see it, I dont need or want a medium penalty for nonUSC crash.


Quote:
If anything, it gives the umpire the discretion to rule a runner out for such an act which may be borderline USC.
I can act right now on borderline USC anytime I want. I tell the coach and/or player to chill it. I dont need a rule to enforce a penalty on borderline USC. It is or it isnt.. if its close I can tell them to chill.



Quote:
As it is right now, a runner could literally coldcock a defender during the play for any reason and the only authority the umpire has is to eject them after the play.
The "only"

Quote:
The umpire cannot call an out and must allow the run if that player scores on the play.
As they should, the defender doesnt have the freakin ball.

I feel a "its for the children..." coming on...
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS

Last edited by wadeintothem; Tue Nov 04, 2008 at 11:00am.
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proposed Rule Changes, ASA? IRISHMAFIA Softball 47 Fri Sep 07, 2007 01:36pm
2006 Proposed Rule Revisions Nevadaref Basketball 56 Fri Mar 31, 2006 06:05pm
Proposed ASA Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 8 Mon Oct 11, 2004 07:09pm
Proposed Rule Changes IRISHMAFIA Softball 22 Wed Oct 06, 2004 02:49pm
2004 Proposed Rule Revisions Nevadaref Basketball 18 Thu Apr 22, 2004 07:37pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1