Interference (NFHS)

[whiskers_ump]

Originally Posted by Andy

Discussion point - Why would you have called INT if the SS continued to the ball, but did not call INT when she stopped? Did you think SS could have gotten to the ball?

Obviously, I was not there to see this play, I can just go by your description. From that, this sounds like INT to me if the SS could have gotten to the ball. The fact that she aborted her attempt due to the presence of the runner and to avoid a possible collision does not take away the INT call.

Just my opinion and trying to generate some discussion.

I see what you are saying and what I said probably caused your thinking.

I would have called INT had the SS continued to the ball immediately. Instead she
took a step back, causing the bump. No, I don't think once she stopped she any chance
of a play.