The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jun 30, 2008, 09:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYBLUE
Sounds to me like the BU thought F4 had a chance to make an out.
Hence, he ruled INT.

Yes, F4 had a chance to make an out.

but 8-7 J (4) says runner interference (only if) she intentionally interferes.

I am having trouble getting Blues to accept that the word "intentional" is still part of that particular rule
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Deflected ball and interference WestMichBlue Softball 10 Tue Oct 18, 2005 06:33pm
Ball lodged in glove: FED interpretation Carl Childress Baseball 67 Tue Oct 12, 2004 07:24am
Runner hit by batted, deflected ball Bluefoot Softball 8 Sun Jun 20, 2004 04:18pm
Runner hit by batted ball after deflected by pitcher tiny Baseball 6 Tue Mar 02, 2004 11:24am
Ball deflected out of play Duke Softball 2 Sat May 10, 2003 05:47am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1