The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 09:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkbjones
...

A list of rule changes to be considered was available to the public, including umpires, on the NFHS web site.
I guess it is my fault, but I had no idea that there was a publicly available list of pending rule changes. Or any idea what to do with my complaints.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 09:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferMC
I guess it is my fault, but I had no idea that there was a publicly available list of pending rule changes. Or any idea what to do with my complaints.
Post them here.

Its about as productive as anything else... or moreso.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 10:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Kind of funny...

The rationale for item number one is, "The additional specification makes NFHS softball consistent with ASA".

Then, item number two introduces a rule change that is the polar opposite of the ASA ruling- and opposite the ruling for every other softball code (save NCAA, which is one rule set that should have no bearing on amateur youth play).

So, is being "consistent with ASA" a valid goal, or not?
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 10:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
I think Irish for the most part pretty much summed up my thoughts on the major issues.
Me too, especially the flag, the arm rotation inconsistency with everyone else, and religious uniform.


Also, several of us responded to Diane Kolb' request for comments about 2008 rules on the NFHS site, but receipt was never confirmed.
http://www.nfhs.org/cgi-bin/ultimate...;f=13;t=000976
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 10:18am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 105
To me NFHS is aligning itself more with the NCAA code in rule specifications and with ASA on equipment specifications.

3 good examples of how the NFHS and NCAA codes are merging.

Allowing metal cleats last year
This new bunt rule that moves it to the NCAA rule for bunting.
Pitching and batting time rules.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 10:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
I guess they are caving in to the coaches / parents at large schools, etc., who are SOOOOO concerned about preparing their daughters for college play.

Where is the actual mission of NFHS sports is all of this?

I won't be surprised if the step back in pitching is not the next to go, and the plate is moved back to 43'.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 10:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Sadly. All it is is a desire by coaches to get a really cheap strike.
and it is stupid.
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne
Me too, especially the flag, the arm rotation inconsistency with everyone else, and religious uniform.


Also, several of us responded to Diane Kolb' request for comments about 2008 rules on the NFHS site, but receipt was never confirmed.
http://www.nfhs.org/cgi-bin/ultimate...;f=13;t=000976
I responded to a NFHS survey on rules changes (for all the good it apparently did).
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 12:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pace, FL
Posts: 653
Send a message via AIM to argodad
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
I guess they are caving in to the coaches / parents at large schools, etc., who are SOOOOO concerned about preparing their daughters for college play.

Where is the actual mission of NFHS sports is all of this?

I won't be surprised if the step back in pitching is not the next to go, and the plate is moved back to 43'.
We've been at 43' in Florida for three years, and have NFHS approval for a "fourth-year experiment." It has not been an issue. The good pitchers are still good and the bad pitchers are no worse than before.

And the step back should go away, IMHO.
__________________
Larry
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 01:46pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Sadly. All it is is a desire by coaches to get a really cheap strike.
Sadly? When I'm on the field, hearing a strike called is not a sad moment as we're now one strike closer to an out.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 02:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3SPORT
To me NFHS is aligning itself more with the NCAA code in rule specifications and with ASA on equipment specifications.

3 good examples of how the NFHS and NCAA codes are merging.

Allowing metal cleats last year
This new bunt rule that moves it to the NCAA rule for bunting.
Pitching and batting time rules.
And yet, HS ball is just about at the end of the list when a player is being recruited behind ASA, NSA, PONY U-trip, AFA, USFA, Triple Crown and about every other acronym-labeled organization which promotes softball.

I think Tom may be on to something. Could this be the NFCA influence?
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 04:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
And yet, HS ball is just about at the end of the list when a player is being recruited behind ASA, NSA, PONY U-trip, AFA, USFA, Triple Crown and about every other acronym-labeled organization which promotes softball.

I think Tom may be on to something. Could this be the NFCA influence?
It is the same thing with basketball. Most of the exposure to college coaches is through AAU summer ball/tournaments. The college coaches can't get out and see the players since the seasons are at the same time of the year so there best look is at the travel team/summer tournament circuit.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 01, 2008, 07:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
I guess they are caving in to the coaches / parents at large schools, etc., who are SOOOOO concerned about preparing their daughters for college play.

Where is the actual mission of NFHS sports is all of this?

I won't be surprised if the step back in pitching is not the next to go, and the plate is moved back to 43'.
That would be nice... and if ASA would allow metal cleats, there would be a little common zen between the two (and NCAA) orgs
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 03, 2008, 03:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 86
A little confused....

7-3-1 Clarified that the timeframe for delivering the next pitch or being in the batter's box begins when the ball has been returned to the pitcher to prepare for the next pitch.

Well, that clarifies everything!!! Is this saying that we have judgment as to when the pitcher is prepared for the next pitch? Am I missing something here?
__________________
Scott C.

NFHS
USSSA
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 03, 2008, 04:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by NM FP Ump
7-3-1 Clarified that the timeframe for delivering the next pitch or being in the batter's box begins when the ball has been returned to the pitcher to prepare for the next pitch.

Well, that clarifies everything!!! Is this saying that we have judgment as to when the pitcher is prepared for the next pitch? Am I missing something here?
It just means that the 20-second and 10-second clock starts for the pitcher and batter, respectively, when the pitcher receives the ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Rules Changes 2009 (Sort of) Tim C Baseball 29 Thu Jul 03, 2008 09:25am
Rule 4-41-3. NFHS NoFear Basketball 6 Tue May 27, 2008 12:06am
NFHS Rule 4:3:d Dholloway1962 Softball 1 Thu Mar 27, 2008 06:11pm
NFHS rule Carl Childress Baseball 8 Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:42am
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1