The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 09:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
It just means that the 20-second and 10-second clock starts for the pitcher and batter, respectively, when the pitcher receives the ball.
Not that it matters. I can almost guarantee at clinic will be a non hardline approach to this, a few "intent" comments, a dab of "let them play ball", and a smidgen of "wink*wink* we dont have a stop watch".

Which is fine by me... but its pretty much useless to revamp unused rules.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 10:07am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
Not that it matters. I can almost guarantee at clinic will be a non hardline approach to this, a few "intent" comments, a dab of "let them play ball", and a smidgen of "wink*wink* we dont have a stop watch".

Which is fine by me... but its pretty much useless to revamp unused rules.
You are correct. This is a game-control rule that is usually enforced when you have a problem child on the PP or a proverbial cat-and-mouse game between the batter and pitcher.

What many umpires do not understand is that they do not have to grant a batter or pitcher time. Just say "no" and indicate both to play. If either do not move immediately to continue, make the call.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 10:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 105
If the time rule was enforced more often, maybe we could stop coaches from giving useless signals with nobody on base and no outs. Or maybe we could break the batter from standing outside the box and beating their backs with 5 or six practice swings while looking at the coach giving useless signals.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 01:20pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3SPORT
6-1-4d
and Note Changed the pitching windup requirement to a maximum of one and a half clockwise revolutions. Previous note was deleted.
Rationale: Pitchers are attempting to gain an advantage by deceiving the batter. The rules change will make an illegal pitch easier to identify and enforcement more consistent.
Hmmm...

If F1 is viewed from her left side, she's clockwise, but from her right side is counter-clockwise...

This must mean that every F1 should be viewed from the 1B side always?

I'd hate to tell the coach that his F1 is illegal every time because her arm isn't going clockwise when we're working 3-umpire mechanics and I'm the rabbit...
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 02:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Hmmm...

If F1 is viewed from her left side, she's clockwise, but from her right side is counter-clockwise...

This must mean that every F1 should be viewed from the 1B side always?

I'd hate to tell the coach that his F1 is illegal every time because her arm isn't going clockwise when we're working 3-umpire mechanics and I'm the rabbit...
Just another case of overthinking a rule. Of course, they will say it was meant from the pitcher's viewpoint. But wouldn't that make a lefthander illegal?

Quote:
Pitchers are attempting to gain an advantage by deceiving the batter.
No $hit!!! Isn't that their job? Wouldn't that be the purpose of a curve ball, riser, drop, change up, etc.?

Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 02:38pm.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 03:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Just another case of overthinking a rule. Of course, they will say it was meant from the pitcher's viewpoint. But wouldn't that make a lefthander illegal?
I guess my DD needs to find a new position.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jul 04, 2008, 03:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Thats now two new rules I'm pretty sure I wont see next year.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NFHS Rules Changes 2009 (Sort of) Tim C Baseball 29 Thu Jul 03, 2008 09:25am
Rule 4-41-3. NFHS NoFear Basketball 6 Tue May 27, 2008 12:06am
NFHS Rule 4:3:d Dholloway1962 Softball 1 Thu Mar 27, 2008 06:11pm
NFHS rule Carl Childress Baseball 8 Mon Sep 06, 2004 10:42am
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) KWH Football 27 Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1