The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 09:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 566
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
What bugs me most about this scandal is that when one accepts a job, they accept it at the pay level offered and should perform it with the utmost integrity. This obviously was not done in this case.
The pay wasn't the problem here. The problem was an official that had a gambling problem and got in debt to the wrong people.
__________________
"Booze, broads, and bullsh!t. If you got all that, what else do you need?"."
- Harry Caray -
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 01:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by gsf23
The pay wasn't the problem here. The problem was an official that had a gambling problem and got in debt to the wrong people.
Shades of Pete Rose.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 03:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluezebra
Shades of Pete Rose.

Bob
Pete Rose did exactly what every player and manager should be required to do, wager part of their income on winning the game.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 25, 2007, 12:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Rules to the contrary not withstanding...

I agree with you, if he is betting on his team and not on the opponent
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 25, 2007, 04:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferMC
Rules to the contrary not withstanding...

I agree with you, if he is betting on his team and not on the opponent
Well, that's what I meant by "on winning the game". Could you imagine some of the great ball that could be seen if the player's paychecks were dependent upon performance?

Guaranteed income is one of the things which chased me away as a fan.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 25, 2007, 09:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Pete Rose did exactly what every player and manager should be required to do, wager part of their income on winning the game.
While I agree with the concept of pay for performance, especially with overpaid professional athletes, the gambling per se is not the real problem here. The real problem is that gambling in this country is run by organized crime, especially in areas where the gambler is dealing with a bookie. Being in regular contact with the crime organizations, and being in debt to them, is where these situations take a left turn into corruption.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jul 25, 2007, 11:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
While I agree with the concept of pay for performance, especially with overpaid professional athletes, the gambling per se is not the real problem here. The real problem is that gambling in this country is run by organized crime, especially in areas where the gambler is dealing with a bookie. Being in regular contact with the crime organizations, and being in debt to them, is where these situations take a left turn into corruption.
Keep telling yourself that and in your mind it will become true. While I do not doubt this may be true in certain areas, I can tell you that what you have stated as a generalization doesn't hold water in many areas.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 26, 2007, 08:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Keep telling yourself that and in your mind it will become true. While I do not doubt this may be true in certain areas, I can tell you that what you have stated as a generalization doesn't hold water in many areas.
What part of what I stated?

That illegal bookie operations are run by criminals? Seems self-evident to me.

Or that frequent contact with organized crime with the predictable result of getting into debt to them may result in people doing desparate things?

Which?

I'm not talking about legal bookmaking. If fact, one helpful action might be to legalize the sports books in all states. It wouldn't help those with a gambling problem, but it would help to remove Uncle Guido from the equation.

And, if you think organized illegal gambling operations are NOT continuing to attempt to influence players, coaches, and officials of all sports of interest (college and professional) in order to get an edge on the odds, you are not facing reality.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 26, 2007, 11:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
In response to IRISH MAFIA:

Pete Rose had a personal services contract with the Reds which guaranteed him his salary.

And he got that based on his performance

Baseball is a business on both sides of the table. Players perform for themselves first, the team is secondary.


Thanks for the insight into Capitalism, but individuals cannot win games, and the odds of making any money by gambling on your team are not very good. Over half the teams in the major leagues are barely at 500 or worse.

Baseball doesn't run the HOF.

The HOF excludes ineligible players from consideration for induction. Major League Baseball has declared Rose ineligible.

Shame of the HOF for ignoring the obvious and not having the courage to do the right thing.

The HOF is bound by its adopted rules. Congratulations to MLB for having the courage to stick by its code of conduct.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 26, 2007, 03:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
What part of what I stated?

That illegal bookie operations are run by criminals? Seems self-evident to me.
That isn't what you said. Your comment The real problem is that gambling in this country is run by organized crime, especially in areas where the gambler is dealing with a bookie.

While I have no doubt that there are areas where OC is involved in illegal gambling, your insinuation is that they run gambling nationwide. IOW, if you gamble with a bookie, you are dealing with OC and that just is not true.

Quote:
I'm not talking about legal bookmaking. If fact, one helpful action might be to legalize the sports books in all states. It wouldn't help those with a gambling problem, but it would help to remove Uncle Guido from the equation.
That is a misconception. Many states run numbers, but the neighborhood runners are still there.

Congress took care of that. I still don't believe they had the right to forbid states from running sports books, but the constitution has never stopped those idiots from doing whatever they want. Only a limited number of states are permitted to run sports books. However, even the legal books would not stop the illegal gambling, just cut their profit margin a bit. Reason: you can call a bookie from your living room and people are lazy. There is also the IRS issues.

Quote:
And, if you think organized illegal gambling operations are NOT continuing to attempt to influence players, coaches, and officials of all sports of interest (college and professional) in order to get an edge on the odds, you are not facing reality.
By the time that happens, the individual has already administered the self-inflicted damage. When it does happen, it is usually a local, isolated case, not some large-scale conspiracy. The folks you mention are given more warning and instruction on how to deal with this issue than you work ball games.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 26, 2007, 02:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
Pete Rose did exactly what every player and manager should be required to do, wager part of their income on winning the game.
That comment insults intelligence.

No player in pro sports had a guaranteed salary without performance.

To argue that players would perform better if they had skin in every game is to ignore that they already do.....free agents who are good get hired....those that aren't don't.

In America we are free to let the market decide what we are worth.

The market rewards the good players a hell of a lot more than the dark world of gambling.

Pete Rose chose to bet on baseball.

Pete Rose, by doing so, has locked himself out of the Hall of Fame.

Too bad for Pete Rose.

Hurrah for Baseball.



Pete Rose represents a sickness that, unchecked, undermines public confidence in sports.

He should never be granted admission to the Hall of Fame.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jul 26, 2007, 07:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimpiano
That comment insults intelligence.
Then you shouldn't have a problem with it.

Quote:
No player in pro sports had a guaranteed salary without performance.
Really? Pete Rose had a personal services contract with the Reds which guaranteed him his salary.

Quote:
To argue that players would perform better if they had skin in every game is to ignore that they already do.....free agents who are good get hired....those that aren't don't.
You keep believing that. Baseball is a business on both sides of the table. Players perform for themselves first, the team is secondary.

Quote:
In America we are free to let the market decide what we are worth.

The market rewards the good players a hell of a lot more than the dark world of gambling.
That must be why so many gamble. And if you think they do not, you are sadly mistaken, and I'm not just talking about baseball.

Quote:
Pete Rose chose to bet on baseball.
Actually, I knew him more to bet on the ponies.

Quote:
Pete Rose, by doing so, has locked himself out of the Hall of Fame.

Too bad for Pete Rose.

Hurrah for Baseball.
Baseball doesn't run the HOF. Shame of the HOF for ignoring the obvious and not having the courage to do the right thing.

Quote:
Pete Rose represents a sickness that, unchecked, undermines public confidence in sports.
Rubbish. Pete Rose and millions of other people in this country gamble for the action and fun. Are there people who think gambling is a quick-fix to financial issues? Yeah, but that doesn't mean the masses with ability to gamble with their head should be deprived of the opportunity to enjoy it.

Quote:
He should never be granted admission to the Hall of Fame.
Another good reason to avoid a sport run by .......(enter disparaging remark here).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your thoughts please eventnyc Basketball 2 Sun Feb 20, 2005 01:08pm
Need your thoughts cypercat Basketball 7 Mon Feb 14, 2005 04:06pm
Getting It Right - Your Thoughts? WindyCityBlue Baseball 61 Mon Oct 25, 2004 09:13am
your thoughts... thumpferee Baseball 27 Mon May 10, 2004 11:05am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1