The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 12:40pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Asa 6(fp).7.b

Bases empty. 2-2 count. Pitch comes in, PU calls ball. F2 reacts, thinks it's a strike, and throws down to F3. BU calls Dead Ball, Illegal Pitch, and sends the BR to 1B on a walk.

How many times have you had this happen to you? Happened to me on Father's Day. I was the BU. First time in 4 years.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Bases empty. 2-2 count. Pitch comes in, PU calls ball. F2 reacts, thinks it's a strike, and throws down to F3. BU calls Dead Ball, Illegal Pitch, and sends the BR to 1B on a walk.

How many times have you had this happen to you? Happened to me on Father's Day. I was the BU. First time in 4 years.
I'm not a big fan of enforcing this rule as an absolute. It is meant to avoid a delay in the game. I think umpires should be a bit more judicious with the application of this rule.

Calling a ball is the correct call, but it is not an IP.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 01:53pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
I'm not a big fan of enforcing this rule as an absolute. It is meant to avoid a delay in the game. I think umpires should be a bit more judicious with the application of this rule.

Calling a ball is the correct call, but it is not an IP.
Speaking for you, am I to assume you meant that, in your opinion, it shouldn't be an IP? Because obviously by rule it is classified as an IP...
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 01:56pm
Never Stop Learning
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 518
In slow pitch it is an additional ball awarded to the batter. In fast pitch it is an illegal pitch. I might have considered the situation in this case. Rule book correct, game situation wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 02:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 306
I think you need to have a game temperament with this call. If it is during a tournament or championship play it must be a ball and IP. I have called this during tournaments and for NFHS games. However if this is a rec league game it could be a ball (depends on how good or bad the coaches have been in the game so far).
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 03:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
I hate this rule.

It's an illegal pitch, but since it doesn't apply with runners on, it's just a ball.

Note: The rule excludes "an attempted put out made by the catcher." There's my loophole.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 03:59pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
Speaking for you, am I to assume you meant that, in your opinion, it shouldn't be an IP? Because obviously by rule it is classified as an IP...
You are correct, in rule 6 it is, but it is not noted as such in rule 7.5.F as an IP (FP) is coverd in 7.5.C. There is no reason for it to be an IP since the worse case scenario of the violation is a ball on the batter.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 05:30pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA
You are correct, in rule 6 it is, but it is not noted as such in rule 7.5.F as an IP (FP) is coverd in 7.5.C. There is no reason for it to be an IP since the worse case scenario of the violation is a ball on the batter.
So...propose a rule change?
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 09:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW
So...propose a rule change?
Don't think they will consider it. It's covered, actually "over covered" with no negative aspect to not making a change, so they will just leave it alone.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 21, 2007, 10:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
If you dont have a good excuse for not enforcing it (say batter drew the throw by running), you HAVE to enforce it (at any real game.)
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 22, 2007, 06:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
If you dont have a good excuse for not enforcing it (say batter drew the throw by running), you HAVE to enforce it (at any real game.)
Batter attempts to check on a pitch in the dirt. Catcher thinking it was a swing for 3rd strike whips the ball to F3 for the put out.

Remember the scenario we threw around last year? I believe the play went something like: the catcher chasing down a wild pitch/passed ball with no runners on base, picks up the ball and throws it to F3 (who is actually the closest defender) to relay it to the pitcher. Technically, a ball should be called on the batter. Intelligently, it should be ignored.

I am not advocating not making the call, but using a little common sense. As previously stated, the purpose of the rule is to not delay the game, not a "gotcha" on the catcher.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 22, 2007, 09:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 143
SRW, since you made the call,

1) Did you consider the exception for the catcher attempting a put out before making the call?
2) Did the defensive coach bring this exception up when you made the call?
3) If either of the above is yes, what was the reason for not considering that exception valid and not making the call?

I suspect I know the reason, but I would like to hear your (and other umps') reasoning.
__________________
Matt
Not an official,
just a full-time dad,
part-time coach,
here to learn.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 22, 2007, 12:44pm
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMatt
1) Did you consider the exception for the catcher attempting a put out before making the call?
There was no attempted put-out by F2. My partner called a ball, and F2 threw to F3. How is that an attempted put-out?
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMatt
2) Did the defensive coach bring this exception up when you made the call?
Nope. He asked me what I just did, so I explained it. I can't say that he was happy about it...
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMatt
3) If either of the above is yes, what was the reason for not considering that exception valid and not making the call?
There is no exception to come into play here.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Jun 22, 2007, 01:33pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 143
Thanks. I figured the only reason for F2 to throw to 1B would be if she thought there was (or was unsure if there was) a D3K call. Just curious if the F2's throw could have been a legitmate attempt to prevent BR from getting to 1B on a mistaken D3K. I know the OP didn't say F2 failed to catch the pitch, but I couldn't think of any reason she would throw to 1B unless she thought there was a possibility of a D3K call.

Of course if the Batter heard "Ball" and F2 didn't, and F2 thought it might be a D3K call, the Batter would have been right around the plate and F2 would/should have gone for a tag instead of throwing to 1B. I am guessing if F2 had tagged the Batter then returned the ball to F1 you would not have made the same call?

Did anyone explain why she threw down to 1B?
__________________
Matt
Not an official,
just a full-time dad,
part-time coach,
here to learn.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jun 23, 2007, 12:45am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamMatt
Thanks. I figured the only reason for F2 to throw to 1B would be if she thought there was (or was unsure if there was) a D3K call.

<.clip.>

Did anyone explain why she threw down to 1B?
IMO, she threw down because she thought it was K3, and was throwing around the horn in celebration.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1