|
|||
Asa 6(fp).7.b
Bases empty. 2-2 count. Pitch comes in, PU calls ball. F2 reacts, thinks it's a strike, and throws down to F3. BU calls Dead Ball, Illegal Pitch, and sends the BR to 1B on a walk.
How many times have you had this happen to you? Happened to me on Father's Day. I was the BU. First time in 4 years.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts. |
|
|||
Quote:
Calling a ball is the correct call, but it is not an IP.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts. |
|
|||
I think you need to have a game temperament with this call. If it is during a tournament or championship play it must be a ball and IP. I have called this during tournaments and for NFHS games. However if this is a rec league game it could be a ball (depends on how good or bad the coaches have been in the game so far).
|
|
|||
I hate this rule.
It's an illegal pitch, but since it doesn't apply with runners on, it's just a ball. Note: The rule excludes "an attempted put out made by the catcher." There's my loophole.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
Remember the scenario we threw around last year? I believe the play went something like: the catcher chasing down a wild pitch/passed ball with no runners on base, picks up the ball and throws it to F3 (who is actually the closest defender) to relay it to the pitcher. Technically, a ball should be called on the batter. Intelligently, it should be ignored. I am not advocating not making the call, but using a little common sense. As previously stated, the purpose of the rule is to not delay the game, not a "gotcha" on the catcher.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
SRW, since you made the call,
1) Did you consider the exception for the catcher attempting a put out before making the call? 2) Did the defensive coach bring this exception up when you made the call? 3) If either of the above is yes, what was the reason for not considering that exception valid and not making the call? I suspect I know the reason, but I would like to hear your (and other umps') reasoning.
__________________
Matt Not an official, just a full-time dad, part-time coach, here to learn. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts. |
|
|||
Thanks. I figured the only reason for F2 to throw to 1B would be if she thought there was (or was unsure if there was) a D3K call. Just curious if the F2's throw could have been a legitmate attempt to prevent BR from getting to 1B on a mistaken D3K. I know the OP didn't say F2 failed to catch the pitch, but I couldn't think of any reason she would throw to 1B unless she thought there was a possibility of a D3K call.
Of course if the Batter heard "Ball" and F2 didn't, and F2 thought it might be a D3K call, the Batter would have been right around the plate and F2 would/should have gone for a tag instead of throwing to 1B. I am guessing if F2 had tagged the Batter then returned the ball to F1 you would not have made the same call? Did anyone explain why she threw down to 1B?
__________________
Matt Not an official, just a full-time dad, part-time coach, here to learn. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts. |
Bookmarks |
|
|