Umpire Baiting Coach - Delay of Game?

[LMan]

The umpire was clearly pizzed that he only needed 1 more run to end the game, and you were denying him that run (temporarily).

What you got against umpires? They have lives too, you know. I bet he needed to get home and cut his lawn before it rained.

[Dukat]

It is ASA. My point is if there is no force then how can I be against the delay of game rule by not running a girl that is not legally obligated to run? Once I got bases loaded after 2 more batters I ran her home as she was required to do.

Irish - There could be and was only one more run scored as once I ran the girl home when forced the game was called.

[Skahtboi]

Personally. I have no problem with Dukat's coaching tactics. I do, however, have a problem with the actions of this particular umpire.

[Dukat]

As an umpire I want to make sure I am following the rules and setting a good example even when I have my other shirt on. That is why I asked my UIC and brought it here to make sure my interpretation is correct. With that said, this umpire is the oldest in our organization and this is his last year and it seems to me that he does not want to be there anymore.

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by Dukat

It is ASA. My point is if there is no force then how can I be against the delay of game rule by not running a girl that is not legally obligated to run? Once I got bases loaded after 2 more batters I ran her home as she was required to do.

Irish - There could be and was only one more run scored as once I ran the girl home when forced the game was called.

Several points:

1) ASA does not allow restricting a coach to the dugout. Maybe your local league does.

2) I, also, have no problem in general with your coaching tactic in this situation. HOWEVER, since your admitted use of the tactic was to delay the completion of the game, it was illegal. As noted above, the rule against delaying the game does not state that the tactics must be in and of themselves illegal. Only that they be noticeably designed to delay the game. Normally, when I see coaches go to station-to-station running, it is to limit the scoring (limit the damage in a blowout), not to avoid hitting the mercy rule. They have long since hit the mercy rule in number of runs; they are just trying to get to through the innings required.

3) I think your desire to delay the game in order to give a couple of more kids some at-bats was a questionable motive.

[NCASAUmp]

I personally see absolutely no problem with what Dukat did. His game still had 30 minutes left, and there's nothing wrong with letting a 15U team get a couple extra at-bats. If a player gets injured, well... it's softball, a sport where injuries are to be expected.

With regards to the "employing tactics to noticeably delay the game," I can't justify holding a runner as being such a tactic, but that's my opinion. If there were two minutes left, then maybe. 30 minutes? Not a chance. Why am I in such a hurry to get the game over with?

[Dukat]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Several points:

1) ASA does not allow restricting a coach to the dugout. Maybe your local league does.

2) I, also, have no problem in general with your coaching tactic in this situation. HOWEVER, since your admitted use of the tactic was to delay the completion of the game, it was illegal. As noted above, the rule against delaying the game does not state that the tactics must be in and of themselves illegal. Only that they be noticeably designed to delay the game. Normally, when I see coaches go to station-to-station running, it is to limit the scoring (limit the damage in a blowout), not to avoid hitting the mercy rule. They have long since hit the mercy rule in number of runs; they are just trying to get to through the innings required.

3) I think your desire to delay the game in order to give a couple of more kids some at-bats was a questionable motive.

In point 1 - I agree, No it is not a local league thing either but it was a tactic that he used in order not to eject him and have to go through that process. The coach did not protest the move therefore it stood.

In points 2 and 3 - I see where you are coming from and understand but I think that it would be over officiating to apply it in this situation. In every game I try to avoid "running the score up" but on the same token try my best to give my girls as much of a chance to play as possible without making a travesty of the game. In my situation I can see where the rule could be applied but the same could be said about a girl who raises her foot an inch off the bag and getting called out for leaving the bag early. Technically illegal but would it be right to call it?

FYI..In the game where he restricted the coach to the bench the next day, it was a FP game and all he was doing was holding the girls to singles after reaching the mercy rule but not yet reaching the number of innings. (Up by 20+ in the 2nd)

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by Dukat

Technically illegal but would it be right to call it?

No... I said it was illegal by your admission of why you were doing it, not that it should be called, or even any notice made of it in your situation.

[Dukat]

Originally Posted by Dakota

No... I said it was illegal by your admission of why you were doing it, not that it should be called, or even any notice made of it in your situation.

OK - I will concede that point.

[Dakota]

Originally Posted by Dukat

FYI..In the game where he restricted the coach to the bench the next day, it was a FP game and all he was doing was holding the girls to singles after reaching the mercy rule but not yet reaching the number of innings. (Up by 20+ in the 2nd)

Jeez... what a piece of work he must be.

[Dukat]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Jeez... what a piece of work he must be.

The main problem is he is wanting out. He has been doing it a very long time and admittedly this is his final year and it shows big time. He is close to 80 years old if not over already and while I have known some really good older umpires that still love the game as much as they did when they first started and I have learned much from them over the years; I have also seen some that have lost that feeling and went longer than they should have. He is in that latter group.

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by Dukat

The main problem is he is wanting out. He has been doing it a very long time and admittedly this is his final year and it shows big time. He is close to 80 years old if not over already and while I have known some really good older umpires that still love the game as much as they did when they first started and I have learned much from them over the years; I have also seen some that have lost that feeling and went longer than they should have. He is in that latter group.

Then, as an act of kindness to both him and the teams, your assignor needs to honor his wishes, and stop assigning him.

[IRISHMAFIA]

I don't believe what you did warranted even a consideration of a forfeit.

But I have a question. What if you were successful in extending the game and the other team made a comeback and are now within a run or two, but if you have the opportunity to run the clock out. However, if your team can wrap up this half inning in quick manner, the last three players in the line-up will get an opportunity to bat one more time. Do you play to get in the next inning or stall to win the game?


You know there is a belief in some circles that a fighter who doesn't knock out his opponent when the opportunity arises, doesn't deserve to win the fight.

[Dukat]

Notice I never had the intent of extending the game another inning but I do see where you are coming from.

[IamMatt]

I just hope when I'm 80 my knees will still allow me to barrel down the baseline!