|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
Quote:
Current: NFHS, NCAA, PONY, USSSA, ASA, MPSSAA, DIAA (aka DSSAA), DSUA, UUA, HARSOA, NASO Past: DSOA, DSRA, USSF, IAABO, BBOA, NNLL Almost: NSA (clinic - no games accepted)
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Quote:
Ditto here in MN.
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Dave I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views! Screw green, it ain't easy being blue! I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again. |
|
|||
I love it every time this argument is raised and all the NFHS bashers have a field day. Ie.,
"NFHS and some lesser (in softball) associations are willing to weaken the standard pitching rule out of fear that certain areas can't compete,” or – "the purpose of allowing the non-pivot foot to be behind the PITCHER'S PLATE was for participation purposes. Apparently, it is easier to pitch without the two-foot restriction and as we all know, not every school has a good pitcher from the start." What bull crap! Lesser associations? Weaken the standard? No good pitchers available? Then please tell me why ASA men have been allowed to “weaken your standard?” Why do the most powerful and fastest FP pitchers in this country need that “additional help? BTW – what happens to the ASA men when they get into international competition? Are they just like a H.S. or L.L. female pitcher that has to change for the tournament, and then goes back to the old way? So how did we get to this point? Originally, and for over fifty years, ASA required both feet in contact with the plate, and the pivot foot could not leave the plate until the stride foot landed (drag was not legal then). Because NFHS followed ASA, the NFHS pitching rules were the same. In about 1985 ASA changed and allowed pitchers (male and female) to step back. NFHS followed and changed its rules. About 1990 ASA changed back to its old rules for females only; men were still allowed to step back. NFHS did NOT follow that change. Why – I don’t know. Maybe they disagreed with ASA. Maybe they decided not to restrict their pitchers. Prior to writing their own rulebook a few years ago, the NCAA used ASA rules. So they simply copied over the ASA Female/JO rule set to their new book. However, L.L. never changed; and USSSA and PONY basically follow NFHS rules so they haven’t changed. “If we see a pitcher in HS stepping back, it's most likely she doesn't play much other than HS ball." So who has been inconsistent? Who keeps changing their pitching rules? Who allowed men (only) to legally leap (in 1992)? Who stopped men from stepping back in 1999, and then reversed direction again one year later? Who took away the leap in 2000? And allowed it back (“toe down rule) in 2005? You may find it positive, or negative – but both NFHS and L.L. normally take years to change their rule sets. I suggest that careful and lengthy deliberation beats bowing to pressure groups frequently. OK, I am off my soapbox. Fire away! WMB |
|
|||||||
Quote:
Sorry, Forrest, but this is what I have been told by Federation folks for a few years now when questioning this exact position Quote:
Quote:
If you must have an answer, it is simple. ASA, and most likely other organizations, adjust their rules for the purpose of competing with ISC. Life in the big city, deal with it, many others in this country do. Quote:
Yep, which is one reason ASA and ISC have created a developmental program for pitchers in the men's program. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And since you want to play the LL card, let's go all the way. IMO, there are only two reasons LL even supports what they call a softball program. Give the organization (1) a place to direct female players interested in playing baseball while (2) still keeping the family money within the organization. BTW, Williamsport shouldn't feel singled out by my opinion as Babe Ruth and a few other baseball-oriented organization are, IMO, operating under the same guise.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Wed May 30, 2007 at 11:41pm. |
|
|||||
Quote:
Fact: ASA required both feet on plate. Fact: NFHS followed ASA in its earliest book ('70's) and required both feet on plate. Fact: ASA changed to allow step back (there was no separte male/female rules then). Fact: NFHS followed ASA and changed to allow step back. Fact: ASA changed rules for females only. Fact: NFHS did not follow ASA this time. So ask your contact if there were in the NFHS meeting 27 years ago when the ASA rule change was discussed and see what the reason for the NFHS position was at that time. Quote:
My definition of "Rec League" is local community programs (L.L. or local organizations) where the parents pay their money and every little Johnny and Suzy gets to play - and the caliber of play is terrible. (I know; I am coaching a 12U boys team now!) Obviously no comparison to H.S. teams that are competitive, and often cut to get down to team size. Travel Ball is another story. All-Star type teams; the best players from where ever; usually try-outs are required. I know of girls that travel 100 miles to play; I used to drive my granddaughter 70 mi (she didn't make the teams in our area); one top player from my town is playing with a team from CA! Obviously, no comparison of these teams to H.S. teams. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
WMB |
|
||||
Quote:
Not all schools have a girl who can pitch at the travel ball level. I have been told (because I never had the skill to pitch in the FP game), that requiring just one foot to be in contact with the plate made it easier for some to adjust and learn to pitch or at least get it near the plate. Let me tell you, I saw quite a few games where the #1 pitcher for a school couldn't pitch the ball without a hump on it. I could only imagine how bad it would be if these girls couldn't use a rocking motion. They are not all that bad and some are pretty good, but those are also the travel ball kids that play for their school. Quote:
The argument express in this thread is that the step-back method is for inferior players than cannot match the ASA standard! So why do ASA men need the step-back? Are they inferior? [/quote] #1, I never made that assertion. I simply stated I was told that it was kept in Fed was for participation purposes. Anything else you presume is supposition. As far as the men are concerned, see below Quote:
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
All due respect to both Mike and WMB, this argument about whether the step back is for novice pitchers or power pitchers is silly. Fact is, some believe it helps both. I think they are right.
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
John An ucking fidiot |
|
|||
Quote:
I stated it was in place for 'PARTICIPATION' reasons. I have been told, it is easier to throw a pitch without being required to have both feet on the pitcher's plate, hence more girls will at least attempt to pitch for their team.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
Like umpiring, longevity only means the person has been around a while.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? | PAT THE REF | Baseball | 60 | Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm |
Grant time-out for "injured" player? | RookieDude | Basketball | 17 | Thu Dec 07, 2006 06:25pm |
Time back on clock? I said "No." | bgtg19 | Basketball | 3 | Wed Dec 06, 2006 06:05pm |
When do you call "Time!" | BuggBob | Softball | 87 | Fri Jun 30, 2006 09:45am |