The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 07:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by reccer
The simple part is understanding the intent of the defensive player setting up astride the base line 2 feet in front of the base.
We should not be even thinking about the intent of the defensive player - only her location.

Quote:
The difficult part is judging whether a runner traveling at 2.5 feet per tenth of a second is reacting to the defensive player.
Agreed. But ANY deviation/reaction is enough in my book if the defensive player is in the wrong place already.

Quote:
Maybe you give the catcher some leeway if the runner is trying to score from second. The runner's path may take her to backside of plate. However, runner starting from third and heading home will be taking direct line. No reason catcher is setting up in baseline for this play. Call obstruction.
Don't treat these differently ... and don't think about the baseLINE at all. (And this may be what you meant...) Consider only the basePATH of the runner, regardless of starting point. Being in the baseLINE is not illegal - only the basePATH matters.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 08:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by tcannizzo
Dead Ball. Runner out for crashing. Return other runners to bases last touched at time of crash.
Not necessarily. Had a situation the other night in a playoff game between two 5A schools, where both the catcher and the pitcher were blocking the runner's access to the plate. Even when the runner tried to move to the inside, the catcher moved with her, caught the ball, and got plowed into all at about the same time. The only ruling I could have possibly had was OBS, because both defensive players were actively hindering the runner's access to the plate, causing her to deviate her path. The subsequent crash was a result, not of interference, but of their obstruction.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 02, 2007, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
If the fielder or catcher being positioned in the base path is the reason the runner can't get to the base; isn't that OBS? If the defender is not blocking and would have had to move into the block, it is not certain that the defender would accomplish the block with the ball. That means being in the base path originally creates an advantage for the defender, hence a disadvantage/impedance for the runner.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
an old mental dilemma Ralph Stubenthal Basketball 27 Thu Feb 12, 2004 02:19pm
Mental check lists for umpires. Mike Simonds Football 11 Thu Jul 18, 2002 06:06pm
Mental Check List? Just Curious Softball 3 Fri Mar 01, 2002 08:44am
mental dilemma! Ralph Stubenthal Basketball 25 Fri Mar 01, 2002 05:19am
Umpiring - The Mental Aspect PeteBooth Baseball 3 Tue Jan 23, 2001 01:04pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1