|
Thu Feb 22, 2007, 10:27am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks.
It is logical, if by that you mean the book is self-consistent. However, I don't like either ASA's or NFHS's attempts to define a play. I think ASA's is too restrictive. Defensive plays often have objectives other than an attempt to retire a runner. OTOH, there are also plenty of examples of the defense throwing the ball around when there is no play happening. I liked it better when it was undefined - you knew it when you saw it.
__________________
Tom 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pass interference - change in NFHS rule | kentref | Football | 29 | Fri Jun 17, 2005 10:24am |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| I actually saw a Basket Interference with the new grabbed ring rule. | Damian | Basketball | 2 | Mon Nov 17, 2003 08:08pm |
| Runner Interference on IFF Rule | Prince | Baseball | 13 | Wed Jul 02, 2003 07:04am |
| D2K interference - did I make up a rule? | Dakota | Softball | 6 | Tue Jun 17, 2003 11:02am |
Threaded Mode
