inteference by batter or not?

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally posted by SamNVa
From Note 1 under Rule 8.4.2h which I interpret as applying to sections 8.4.2(d,e,f, & g) as well, a retired runner is basically treated the same as a live runner, i.e. hindering a fielder is interference whether it is intentional or not, interference with a thrown ball, must be intentional.

In accordance with FED's stand on walks and the 3-foot lane, I believe that if the retired BR is running outside the lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first, by getting plunked, etc., then the umpire would be justified in ruling the interference intentional and calling the runner nearest to home out.

If the throw were going to another base like 2nd (as was described in the original thread I believe) then the BR would have to do something more than just being in the way for interference to be called.

Again all of this is for FED, not ASA.

--Sam

Sam,

The only problem I have with this is that the rule you are citing is applicable to "runners", not batter-runner. If this "note" was under 8.4.1, I would agree with you, but it is not. According to 2.2.2 and 2.14.2, a batter who is out on strikes never attains BR or runner status by definition, so I do not believe you can make that presumption without further direction from NFHS.

JMHO,