View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 27, 2001, 02:24pm
SamNVa SamNVa is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 476
Send a message via ICQ to SamNVa Send a message via AIM to SamNVa Send a message via Yahoo to SamNVa
In my opinion, the operative word in the ruling is "COULD". I would still have to judge intent to interfere on the batter's part in order to make the interference call. I would base my judgement on whether the BR continued to run after my emphatic call of OUT. If she continued to run after that, then I could justify a call of interference.
Reply With Quote