The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
ASA Lookback Rule

Need some opinions on this play: (ASA 18U tournament in St. Louis)

Runner on 3rd. Batter receives a walk. The ball is promptly returned to the pitcher within the circle. Runner on 3rd is off the bag about 10-feet poised to go home, watching the pitcher closely. BR never stops at 1st and continues on to 2nd, meanwhile, the pitcher looks on from within the circle. The pitcher is concerned the runner from 3rd will attempt to score if she makes a play on the BR. Basically, the pitcher and runner at 3rd have a stare down, but neither makes a move. The BR arrives at 2nd base, standing up, with no play having been made on her. The other runner simply returns to 3rd.

The defense wants the runner on 3rd called out on the "Lookback Rule", claiming she was off the base while the pitcher was in the circle with the ball.

The defense claims that a play was in progress since the BR never STOPPED at first, therefore, ALL runners were free to do whatever they wanted. They claimed that the BR, by continuing to run, caused the play to remain live and that the defense couldn't "freeze" other runners while another runner was free to advance.

Basically the argument came down to this:

1. The defense acknowledged that the BR was free to advance despite the ball being in the circle, however, the other runner had to either advance or return to third or be subject to being called out for a "Lookback Rule" violation.

2. The offense claimed that if one runner was free to advance then all runners were free to advance. Had the BR stopped at 1st and the other runner remained off the bag, then she could have been called out for a violation. But the BR never stopped! That kept the play live. The pitcher cannot use the "Lookback Rule" to freeze runners as long as one runner is legally continuing her advance. Theoretically, the BR could have run completely around the bases and scored while the pitcher looked on with the ball in the circle. If that is so then, obviously, the runner at 3rd would be free to advance as well.

The umpires consulted with one another and decided not to call out any runners and claimed there was no "Lookback Rule" violation.

The defense protested the ruling claiming that the rule had been misapplied.

The defense ultimately won the game and withdrew the protest.

It would have been interesting had it been resolved.

Any opinions?

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Crete, Nebraska
Posts: 734
Send a message via ICQ to shipwreck
I have a LBR out. Since the ball was in the circle and the batter/runner made it to first and the pitcher made no motion while in the circle, the runner at third has to make a decision whether to go back to third or advance home. I have called this out numerous times over the years. This is similiar to if the girl would have stayed on third while this happened and then came off the base. When I work with someone that I regularly work with, the BU takes the batter/runner into second while the PU watches what the runner at third is doing. There is timing involved as to when and if the pitcher makes a motion. If the runner from third is just standing there watching the play in hopes that the pitcher makes a motion toward the batter/runner, I have an out. Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 10:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
David said - "Basically the argument came down to this:

1. The defense acknowledged that the BR was free to advance despite the ball being in the circle, however, the other runner had to either advance or return to third or be subject to being called out for a "Lookback Rule" violation.

2. The offense claimed that if one runner was free to advance then all runners were free to advance. Had the BR stopped at 1st and the other runner remained off the bag, then she could have been called out for a violation. But the BR never stopped! That kept the play live. The pitcher cannot use the "Lookback Rule" to freeze runners as long as one runner is legally continuing her advance. Theoretically, the BR could have run completely around the bases and scored while the pitcher looked on with the ball in the circle. If that is so then, obviously, the runner at 3rd would be free to advance as well.

The umpires consulted with one another and decided not to call out any runners and claimed there was no "Lookback Rule" violation.

The defense protested the ruling claiming that the rule had been misapplied.

The defense ultimately won the game and withdrew the protest."

The defense' position is correct. Every individual runner is subject to it - as individuals, not as a team. Your play sure sounds like a mia-applied rule. If explained to those hearing the protest, it would have been upheld.


The offense knows they got away with one. They sold some bad dope with their argument that The pitcher cannot use the "Lookback Rule" to freeze runners as long as one runner is legally continuing her advance. The pitcher does not freeze the runner(s), the rule deals with them. It sounds like those umps bought the bad dope - and smoked it.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 10:59am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Yup, the protest in this situation would have certainly been upheld. Once the BR touched first, providing no play was being made by the pitcher(we all know the definition, a fake throw...etc.), then the runner had third had to either advance to home or retreat to third. Just standing there, off the bag, constitutes a violation of the LBR.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 11:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skahtboi
Yup, the protest in this situation would have certainly been upheld. Once the BR touched first, providing no play was being made by the pitcher(we all know the definition, a fake throw...etc.), then the runner had third had to either advance to home or retreat to third. Just standing there, off the bag, constitutes a violation of the LBR.
Thanks for all the good answers.

I suspected that this was the correct answer but wasn't certain.

This has spawned a new question, however:

What would constitute the pitcher making a play on BR?

1. The pitcher moves toward the advancing BR, yet remains within the circle. She doesn't make any throw or fakes.

2. The pitcher turns toward the advancing BR, raises her arm with the ball in hand as if to make a throw, but makes no throw nor fake.

Thanks!

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling
What would constitute the pitcher making a play on BR?

1. The pitcher moves toward the advancing BR, yet remains within the circle. She doesn't make any throw or fakes.
This would not be considered making a play on a runner. Simply walking within the circle in the direction of any runner does not constitute making a play.

Quote:
2. The pitcher turns toward the advancing BR, raises her arm with the ball in hand as if to make a throw, but makes no throw nor fake.
This would be considered making a play on a runner. Once the arm goes up, that's all it takes.

[QUOTE]
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 11:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling
What would constitute the pitcher making a play on BR?

1. The pitcher moves toward the advancing BR, yet remains within the circle. She doesn't make any throw or fakes.

2. The pitcher turns toward the advancing BR, raises her arm with the ball in hand as if to make a throw, but makes no throw nor fake.
Did the BR react to either of these?

"What is a play by the pitcher" is umpire judgment. According to ASA, a fake throw is a play; also any action by the pitcher that, in the umpire's judgment, causes a reaction by a runner is a play.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
A couple of notes not yet mentioned.

First - proper ruling on this would (even in retrospect) put the BR back on first! Why? Proper timing of the LBR would be "immediately" after BR reached first base. Immediately is generally about 1 or 1 1/2 seconds. No BR could get from 1st to 2nd in the amount of time generally allowed for "immediately". LBR is an immediate dead ball, and BR would have been short of 2nd at that time. Send her back.

Second - the defense is not "enacting" the rule or "freezing" the runner by it's actions. The offense's contention is not only incorrect, but the logic leading up to it is inaccurate. It the actions of the OFFENSE (coupled with INaction on the defense's part) that enact the LBR on each individual runner. The action that precipitated the LBR was the runner's failure to move in one direction or the other. If the original PU would have been thinking of LBR in these terms, I suspect he'd have made the right call on the spot.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 01:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling
Thanks for all the good answers.

I suspected that this was the correct answer but wasn't certain.

This has spawned a new question, however:

What would constitute the pitcher making a play on BR?

1. The pitcher moves toward the advancing BR, yet remains within the circle. She doesn't make any throw or fakes.

2. The pitcher turns toward the advancing BR, raises her arm with the ball in hand as if to make a throw, but makes no throw nor fake.

Thanks!

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
As Tom has already noted, these are judgement call situations. In the first sitch, if I felt the "move" was an attempt to indicate a pending possible play, or to get a reaction out of the runner, then it is entirely possible that I would release the runner from any LBR infractions.

In your second situation, I would most likely not have the LBR in effect.
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 05:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
A couple of notes not yet mentioned.

First - proper ruling on this would (even in retrospect) put the BR back on first! Why? Proper timing of the LBR would be "immediately" after BR reached first base. Immediately is generally about 1 or 1 1/2 seconds. No BR could get from 1st to 2nd in the amount of time generally allowed for "immediately". LBR is an immediate dead ball, and BR would have been short of 2nd at that time. Send her back.
I disagree with this.

The defense cannot force the BR to remain at first by simply returning the ball to the circle. That would only be true if the BR advanced to first and stopped.

However, as is usually the case with this offensive tactic, the BR never stops. She trots to first and then, after touching the bag, she accelerates to 2nd in the hope to get a reaction from the pitcher - hoping the runner on 3rd may get an opportunity to score.

Since the BR never stopped she is under no obligation to stop. This would not be a "Look Back Rule" violation.

But now, as I have learned, since the runner at 3rd did stop, she is subject to a "Look Back Rule" violation if she does not immediately return to 3rd or advance towards home.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 06:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling
I disagree with this.

The defense cannot force the BR to remain at first by simply returning the ball to the circle. That would only be true if the BR advanced to first and stopped.

However, as is usually the case with this offensive tactic, the BR never stops. She trots to first and then, after touching the bag, she accelerates to 2nd in the hope to get a reaction from the pitcher - hoping the runner on 3rd may get an opportunity to score.

Since the BR never stopped she is under no obligation to stop. This would not be a "Look Back Rule" violation.

But now, as I have learned, since the runner at 3rd did stop, she is subject to a "Look Back Rule" violation if she does not immediately return to 3rd or advance towards home.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Correct. It seems there are some umpires who need to read my signature tag line.

Also, let's remember that the LBR is really a RCR (runner control rule) and is not intended to be a "gotcha" (usual caveat); and no good umpire would call a violation unless it violates the intent and spirit. Emerling's example of the pitcher walking toward the runner could very well be a play or fake play, so only a "gotcha" umpire would call the a LBR violation. Unless of course, the runner had violated the rule before the pitcher moved or after she stopped.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 08:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Emerling
I disagree with this.
You disagree with what?
That the LBR goes into effect on R1 as soon as the BR touches 1B?
That if R1 does not, then, "immediately" start moving that she has violated the LBR?
That the LBR is an immediate dead ball?
That the BR should be returned to 1B after the LBR call on R1?
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 09:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Germantown, TN (east of Memphis)
Posts: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota
You disagree with what?
That the LBR goes into effect on R1 as soon as the BR touches 1B?
That if R1 does not, then, "immediately" start moving that she has violated the LBR?
That the LBR is an immediate dead ball?
That the BR should be returned to 1B after the LBR call on R1?
Perhaps I misread what you wrote. But you seemed to suggest that the BR would be in violation of the LBR simply because the ball was returned promptly to the pitcher within the circle - with no play made on the BR. The BR's advance to 2nd, according to what you wrote, would be a violation.

That is what I disagree with.

The LBR rule does begin when the BR reaches 1st, however, if the BR never stops her forward progress; she is not in violation whether the ball is in the circle or not.

David Emerling
Memphis, TN
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 26, 2006, 11:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
I didn't write it - mcrowder did; and, as I read his post, he was referring to a LBR violation on R1 for standing off 3B while the BR advances to 2B.

If he was talking about the BR being in violation, she would be out, not returned. What he was saying was the LBR call on R1 kills the ball, and so the BR cannot continue to 2B.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 27, 2006, 04:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 143
I am just a dad and volunteer coach with no softball background but I have copies of the ASA rules and try to read them often.

[sarcasm]But I don't recall reading anything about "the batter runner keeps the play live" or "the pitcher freezes the runners." I just read POE 32 again and didn't see it. Did I miss a page?[/sarcasm]
__________________
Matt
Not an official,
just a full-time dad,
part-time coach,
here to learn.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lookback rule David Emerling Softball 29 Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:19am
What's going on with lookback? Dakota Softball 14 Sun May 23, 2004 05:55am
Lookback Rule at 2nd Base dan_renninger Softball 31 Wed Jul 23, 2003 01:19am
Lookback, Lookback and Lookback.. Again sprivitor Softball 8 Wed Jun 25, 2003 02:55pm
Lookback question DanIn Softball 2 Sat Jun 14, 2003 07:37am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1