The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 11:30am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Crete, Nebraska
Posts: 734
Send a message via ICQ to shipwreck
Read the OP. He said bases loaded and none out. Dave
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 11:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipwreck
Read the OP. He said bases loaded and none out. Dave
Somehow, only part of my post got sent and it was very incomplete at that.
So I fixed it, sorry for any confusion.
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 94
My concern with applying the infield fly rule "after the fact" is that the baserunners may have tried to advance thinking they had to because the infield fly rule was not called while the ball was in the air. It seems a little unfair if any of them were tagged out because they thought they had to run instead of running at their own risk.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Live Free or Die Country
Posts: 175
Send a message via Yahoo to CelticNHBlue
As Scott said, they are equally responsible for knowing the situation and have base coaches to, well, coach them.

However, in NCAA, if infield fly is not called, it was not in effect, therefor, the batter is not out.
__________________
Wade Ireland
Softball Umpire
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 01:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Robertson
My concern with applying the infield fly rule "after the fact" is that the baserunners may have tried to advance thinking they had to because the infield fly rule was not called while the ball was in the air. It seems a little unfair if any of them were tagged out because they thought they had to run instead of running at their own risk.
Why would this be unfair?
Would you have allowed a run to score if a runner had crossed the plate when the IF wasn't called?
Now where if the fairness.

Answer this, what is the purpose and intent of the rule?
If you can understand the purpose/intent of a rule then you can apply it correctly.
This applies to all rules and all codes.

Purpose and intent = a correct enforcement of any rule.
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 01:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 78
Why would you enforce this rule if this ball suddenly blew back? That does not make much sense.

In order to CALL the infield fly rule, you must also have ordinary effort. If the ball falls in, how is that ordinary effort? The goal here is to not give an easy double play, not give an out to the defense cause the offense popped the ball up.

I say NO infield fly and if you dont call it at first, forget it and move on with life. All this talk about it calling itself is true, I guess, but also very unpractical and hard to talk yourself out of.

Orangey
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 02:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 573
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangeump
Why would you enforce this rule if this ball suddenly blew back? That does not make much sense.

In order to CALL the infield fly rule, you must also have ordinary effort. If the ball falls in, how is that ordinary effort? The goal here is to not give an easy double play, not give an out to the defense cause the offense popped the ball up.

I say NO infield fly and if you dont call it at first, forget it and move on with life. All this talk about it calling itself is true, I guess, but also very unpractical and hard to talk yourself out of.

Orangey
Why would you NOT call the IF when the ball gets blown back in?
This is not a rare occurence, unusual-yes.
In the original sitch, it landed right in front of the F6, I don't see how it couldn't have been caught with ordinary effort.

Way back, when I was doing spring training in baseball we even had this same type of situation occur. The rule is the same for baseball and softball here.

I have seen the ball blown back in from foul territory, I mean way foul, over the stands foul but you still have to call it.

If you don't call/enforce the IF, you are putting the defense at a disadvantage.

Enforce the rules evenly and fairly, that is our job.
__________________
ISF
ASA/USA Elite
NIF

Last edited by scottk_61; Wed Aug 23, 2006 at 02:05pm.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 23, 2006, 02:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Let's not lose sight of the fact that, in your judgment, the ball had to be playable with ordinary effort by an infielder. If the wind was that bad, it may be possible that nothing may have been playable with ordinary effort.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Wed Aug 23, 2006 at 04:06pm.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Too late for me, but.... justacoach Basketball 10 Mon May 29, 2006 01:28pm
Infield Fly Call sm_bbcoach Baseball 11 Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:23am
Erroneous Infield Fly Call whistleone Softball 5 Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:10pm
Infield Fly if you don't call it immediately FUBLUE Softball 19 Fri Jun 25, 2004 11:16am
late hit F C E Football 5 Thu Oct 31, 2002 09:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1