The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 06:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 77
ASA Mandatory Slide

Is there a mandatory ASA fast-pitch "must-slide" rule for a runner coming home (or any other base)? If not, are local jurisdictions allowed to add a mandatory "must-slide" rule?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 07:35am
JEL JEL is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwbuddy
Is there a mandatory ASA fast-pitch "must-slide" rule for a runner coming home (or any other base)? If not, are local jurisdictions allowed to add a mandatory "must-slide" rule?

No, and yes.

If a local jurisdiction, (or any jurisdiction) mandates a "must slide" rule, they are asking for trouble. Sliding can result in injuries. If a runner was following a mandated rule to slide and was thusly injured, (and I've seen broken legs, ankles, and one foot almost completely torn off!) the league or jurisdiction could be liable for the injury.

The ruling is that a runner cannot crash into a fielder who has the ball waiting to apply a tag. The ASA interp is that a runner MAY slide, jump over, go around, or return to the previous base (home excluded), when a fielder is attempting to tag. This however will not give the right for a runner to deliberately crash into one who does not have the ball.

If you have access to an ASA rule book, read POE 14.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 09:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kananga, DR Congo ex Illinois
Posts: 279
No doubt, do not add "must" to slide. If your park district wants to make it avoid any contact fine but always leave it up to the player to decide how to avoid a collision. I always said in my pregames to remind your players that all hitting should be below the belt, slide, give yourself up, go around but if I get torso to torso I've got a judgement call to make.

Inevitably every year I'd hear "but if he's in the way without the ball...." my reply "you still have to go around and I'll stick out my left arm for you but if you crash into him then I'll be using my right arm and probably doing some pointing, as in where the exit is".
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 11:49am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 306
Last night with NO play at the plate the defensive captain runs on to the field telling me the runner must slide at home (the ball was at third). I tell him, there's no such rule. He loudly yells "Tha's Bull****!" He went to the parking lot.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 12:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuggBob
Last night with NO play at the plate the defensive captain runs on to the field telling me the runner must slide at home (the ball was at third). I tell him, there's no such rule. He loudly yells "Tha's Bull****!" He went to the parking lot.
Did you tell him he had to slide when he got to his HOME?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 964
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChampaignBlue
Inevitably every year I'd hear "but if he's in the way without the ball...." my reply "you still have to go around and I'll stick out my left arm for you but if you crash into him then I'll be using my right arm and probably doing some pointing, as in where the exit is".
Contact by a runner against a defender that does not have the ball is obstruction (NFHS).

If the contact is malicious, then malicious contact overrides obstruction and runner is called out and ejected. ONLY if malicious. Contact may be violent; someone may get injured. But that itself is not necessarily malicious. You need to see a deliberate action on the part of the runner to injure or create a violent collision.

WMB
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 15, 2006, 12:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestMichBlue
Contact by a runner against a defender that does not have the ball is obstruction (NFHS).

If the contact is malicious, then malicious contact overrides obstruction and runner is called out and ejected. ONLY if malicious. Contact may be violent; someone may get injured. But that itself is not necessarily malicious. You need to see a deliberate action on the part of the runner to injure or create a violent collision.

WMB
I thought the definition of malicious in the rule books as opposed to the dictionary is forceful, not about intent.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FED going with mandatory face masks on batting helmets next year. TwoBits Softball 15 Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:14pm
mandatory stick checks loulax Lacrosse 2 Fri May 28, 2004 01:35pm
FED Mandatory Helmet Rule Dave Sirbu Baseball 9 Thu Mar 01, 2001 05:45pm
Mandatory Requirements llblue Baseball 1 Thu Mar 01, 2001 12:46pm
High School Mandatory Sub for Injured Keeper? heracles74 Soccer 2 Mon Jan 01, 2001 09:07pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1