|
|
|
Sat May 06, 2006, 09:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
OK maybe I used the wrong terminology, as that would be considered catcher's OBSTRUCTION. Would the bat nicking the catcher's glove on a swinging strike be considered obstruction, or a no call? Just trying to clear this up in my mind:-)
|
|
Sat May 06, 2006, 10:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Yes, it is CO, but awfully hard to call if you did not see or hear it.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
|
Sat May 06, 2006, 10:40am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
|
|
Sat May 06, 2006, 10:49am
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I did not have some evidence (sight or sound) independent of F2's apology, I would not call it. Same thing, BTW, for the batter or coach arguing that there was CO. If I did not see it or hear it, then it did not happen.
__________________
Tom
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASA OBS call then no call leads to ejection | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 28 | Mon Jul 12, 2004 03:52pm |
| To call or not to call foul ball | DaveASA/FED | Softball | 11 | Thu Jun 24, 2004 11:47am |
| More Pacers/Pistons call/no call | OverAndBack | Basketball | 36 | Thu Jun 03, 2004 07:01pm |
| Good Call / Bad Call | whiskers_ump | Softball | 29 | Fri Mar 28, 2003 09:35am |
| Does one call relate to the last call? | Tee | Basketball | 28 | Thu Feb 13, 2003 05:53pm |
Hybrid Mode
