The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 01, 2004, 08:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maryland (northeast of Baltimore)
Posts: 371
This happened yesterday. A two part question. Fed rules.

Part one. No runners on. I'm in the field. Batter hits ball to pitcher who easily fields and throws to first. F3 does the typical strech to receive the ball but drops the routine throw. Ball rolls about 6 inches into foul territory. F3 picks up ball and reaches back with her foot touching only orange bag (from my angle anyway: more on that later ). Runner, thinking she was an easy out, stops 10-15 feet away and starts walking to her dugout. Coach sees what I see and tells her to get on the base, which she does. I have given no call until batter reached base, then I signal safe. Given this information, do you agree or disagree with my call? I seem to remember a recent discussion saying this was not a time orange bag could be used.


Part two. After I satisfied the offensive coach that I made the right call (if I did), home ump calls me in and says from his angle F1 touched the part of the orange bag that was directly over the white chalk line. In other words the chalk line was a few inches too far to the right. He brought up the idea that if we were using the line as it was then that portion of the bag was actually in fair territory. After thinking about it for a moment I agreed with his logic and reversed myself calling the runner out( and then explained everything to the defensive coach). Given this information, do you agree or disagree with my reversal? By the way I definitely think we blew not seeing the misplaced chalk line before the game started.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 01, 2004, 08:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 548
Send a message via AIM to TexBlue
Fed Rule 8-2 Art 12 Exceptions (2) says that if a missed throw pulls the defensive player to the foul ground, the BR can use white, Defense can use Orange.

Just because the line is a little off, the white and orange part of the base should stay the same, otherwise you open up a whole new, ugly can of worms. Stay on White or Stay on Orange. Don't give 2 1/32 inches of Orange to the defense because of the foul line. You'll never be able to convince anyone of that. They'll still be out or safe, but you'll never convince anyone of it. Don't create problems, Heck, they'll find you often enough, anyway.
__________________
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 02, 2004, 02:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
Chalked lines should run only to the base from home, then
from the opposite side of the base towards foul poles.
Not through or over a base.

Naturally, this is JMHO.
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 02, 2004, 04:06pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
By definition, fair ends at the outside of the "white" base, so if the line is wrong, tough.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 02, 2004, 10:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 112
You said "Part one. No runners on. I'm in the field. Batter hits ball to pitcher who easily fields and throws to first. F3 does the typical strech to receive the ball but drops the routine throw." In my opinion a dropped throw is not an errant throw therefore I would have a safe call as the defense never touched the White Bag and without the errant throw the Orange Bag does not apply.

I also echo comments regarding White line.
__________________
"Just My Humble Opinion"

The Bagman
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 12:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
As we can't agree on what "errant throw" means anyway and the intent of the rule is to avoid collisions; I would disagree and allow the defense use of the foul side because the ball ended up in foul ground.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 01:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
I had brought up a couple of months ago a situation where the "errant" throw from F6 hits the base of the wall which happens to be concrete on one particular field, bouncing conveniently back to F3, who is now touching orange, reaching toward foul ground. This made sense as an out to me, but I was summarily shouted down by this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 02:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 548
Send a message via AIM to TexBlue
Quote:
Originally posted by mcrowder
I had brought up a couple of months ago a situation where the "errant" throw from F6 hits the base of the wall which happens to be concrete on one particular field, bouncing conveniently back to F3, who is now touching orange, reaching toward foul ground. This made sense as an out to me, but I was summarily shouted down by this forum.
Guess I missed that one. I've got an out on that too. So, I guess you might have been summarily shouted down, but not unanimously.
__________________
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 02:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 112
We may never agree what anerrant throw is but a "Dropped Ball" should not be an errant throw because errant throws are not caught or dropped, missed yes. JMHO
__________________
"Just My Humble Opinion"

The Bagman
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 03, 2004, 04:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 548
Send a message via AIM to TexBlue
Quote:
Originally posted by Bagman62
We may never agree what anerrant throw is but a "Dropped Ball" should not be an errant throw because errant throws are not caught or dropped, missed yes. JMHO
But this was Federation. The rule I quoted, Rule 8-2 Art 12 Exceptions (2) says missed throw, which would qualify here, I believe. I think you just gotta go with what we think the intent of the rule is. I believe they are trying to avoid collisions which could result in injuries. Didn't look up ASA, since this was FED, but I think the intent is the same, if not the wording.

Feel free to correct me.
__________________
Rick
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 04, 2004, 08:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
So let me get this straight: I know that the BR may use the white portion of the bag if necessary to avoid a collision. If she does, then the defense may use the orange portion?
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1