|
|||
It is an interpretation to minimize intimidation or superiority.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Our association hands out the Softball 2023 Preseason Guide. It looks to be an NFHS Referee publication.
On the cover this year is a picture of 2 young ladies who are both wearing eye black or some type of face paint. Is this a state interpretation prohibiting eye black? I don't think there's anything in the rule book about it. This publication also has a few pictures each year that simply don't pay attention to detail. This year's bloopers include a picture of 2 umpires wearing different jackets (pg. 10). I understand that sometimes officials don't always have the identical jackets, but for a picture in a national publication, find a pair that do match. Another is regarding obstruction at first base. The picture on page 14 shows what might be a college game. NFHS permits (not required) a safety base and it is up to states to decide if they wish to use it. But again, for a HS publication, why couldn't they use the saftey base in their photo?
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
NFHS has no such rule. Delaware and Pennsylvania have rules restricting eye black to a single mark under one or each eye. Maryland has no rule about it.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
Same as Delaware and Pennsylvania.in NC
Last edited by DRJ1960; Thu Mar 23, 2023 at 03:39pm. Reason: original post unclear. |
|
|||
But, why? Did someone create something objectionable?
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
NFHS Softball Weekly Rule Interpretations
Situation 5:
Team A begins to take the field and the umpires notice that several players have eye black in the shape of a heart on their faces. Several other players have eye black that has been applied in streaks down their cheeks. The umpire rules this illegal and requires all of Team A’s players to remove any eye black that is more than a single line below the eyes. RULING: Incorrect ruling. NFHS Softball has no rule specifically covering the application of eye black.
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
Quote:
The above case ruling would be correct in those States, although like dangerous jewelry, bandannas, etc.; I never say take it off, just that they can't play with it. We umpire in two States, one with a rule, one without.
__________________
Formerly CecilOne Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFHS Rules | benbret | Football | 2 | Tue Oct 25, 2022 02:14pm |
NFHS Rules | benbret | Volleyball | 1 | Sat Jul 20, 2019 01:35pm |
NFHS Rules Interpreters versus IAABO Rules Interpreters | dpicard | Basketball | 7 | Mon Dec 07, 2009 01:13pm |
I need help with NFHS Rules. | Chitowncubfan | Football | 9 | Thu Sep 11, 2003 10:01pm |
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) | KWH | Football | 27 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am |