The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 26, 2018, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Offense Only terminology

I think we had a consensus on this, but can't search for 2 letters as a key.

When the DP is playing the field, some other batter is then not in the field, just batting. That other batter should be noted on the lineup for reference.

NCAA uses OP for that (Offense Player, although all the batters are).

USA, NFHS, etc. have nothing defined; so do we
- use OP , Offense Player, as NCAA for consistency
- use OO for the more specific Offense Only

I need something for teaching purposes, USA, NFHS.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 26, 2018, 01:46pm
Call it as I see it.
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 327
There is no true terminology in USA and NFHS for Offensive Player who is sitting on the bench.
__________________
"I couldn't see well enough to play when I was a boy, so they gave me a special job - they made me an umpire." - President of the United States Harry S. Truman
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 26, 2018, 03:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insane Blue View Post
There is no true terminology in USA and NFHS for Offensive Player who is sitting on the bench.
Exactly, looking for a consensus on what we have said before, or now think, and therefore what to push for and teach.

Searching for OO or OP is rejected by the search as too short.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 26, 2018, 04:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont, NH
Posts: 1,352
In the handful of occasions that this has happened to me while the PU, I simply note on my lineup card that #X is playing "bench". And, that DP is playing F-something.

To me, this indicates that the DP is playing defense for this player.

When it gets tricky is when the coach wants that "bench" player to go in for the flex. Now the DP is playing defense for the flex and the batting order has gone from 10 to 9.

Had a debate with a coach in a tournament game along these lines. Coach claimed that the DP could play defense for anyone. I agreed. But when he went to pull that tricky deal in the next inning, I told him his flex was now out of the game and would require a re-entry to return.
__________________
Ted
USA & NFHS Softball
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jun 26, 2018, 04:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tru_in_Blu View Post
When it gets tricky is when the coach wants that "bench" player to go in for the flex. Now the DP is playing defense for the flex and the batting order has gone from 10 to 9.
Hopefully, no umpires take that literally.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Hopefully, no umpires take that literally.
What is happening here is that the "bench" player is back on defense, but the FLEX is on the bench, so the DP is technically playing defense for the FLEX and the FLEX has left the game.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy View Post
What is happening here is that the "bench" player is back on defense, but the FLEX is on the bench, so the DP is technically playing defense for the FLEX and the FLEX has left the game.
Exactly what I hoped everyone would see.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 11:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insane Blue View Post
There is no true terminology in USA and NFHS for Offensive Player who is sitting on the bench.
How about a consensus on the forum?
Is the NCAA "OP" the best answer?

Unfortunately "bench" can also mean someone out of the game.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 03:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
I only use the OP in NCAA play due to the rule that all defensive changes have to be reported and I want to keep my lineup card current.

For all other play, it is not required to report defensive changes (exception of the DP playing defense for the FLEX), so I don't see the need to have a standard notation.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 04:09pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy View Post
I only use the OP in NCAA play due to the rule that all defensive changes have to be reported and I want to keep my lineup card current.

For all other play, it is not required to report defensive changes (exception of the DP playing defense for the FLEX), so I don't see the need to have a standard notation.
After a recent experience (Help Needed topic), and knowing some are not as sharp, I want them to recognize that player does not become the DP, and others to know the status in case of the dreaded postponed take over by another ump.

Also, in my teaching mode, emphasizing completing recording; sometimes an issue.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jun 27, 2018, 07:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 8
Go with Andy on this one. Your standard system should work in USA without having to note. I use line circle line method and an F to denote when Flex is in for DP. -Ron
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Jun 28, 2018, 07:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
After a recent experience (Help Needed topic), and knowing some are not as sharp, I want them to recognize that player does not become the DP, and others to know the status in case of the dreaded postponed take over by another ump.

Also, in my teaching mode, emphasizing completing recording; sometimes an issue.
I think you may confuse them more than help them. I agree with Andy on this one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A "Balk" terminology question walkerbard Baseball 15 Thu Jul 16, 2015 11:41am
NHSF "intentional" vs NCAA "flagarent" terminology Duffman Basketball 17 Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:15pm
A-11 Offense ?? TXMike Football 203 Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:43pm
Simple terminology Q Luv4Asian8 Basketball 4 Fri Nov 30, 2007 06:30pm
new terminology Mark Padgett Basketball 5 Sat Jan 12, 2002 09:05pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1