![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
Okay, here's another play that meets the same definition. B1 hits a high fly to center. Before the ball is caught, she is obstructed rounding first by F3 who is spectating the catch standing near the base. Same effective play; so same result, right? Yeah; call the out in both cases. The only time you should consider obstruction (there is only one kind, defenseive; if the offense violates it's called interference) in the OP is if there is a bobble or bad throw, and the obstruction keeps the runner from having a chance to be safe. When dead out is the result of the play absent obstruction on these type of plays, call the out, and award a spot on the bench.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
|
|||
A caught fly ball situation is completely different and covered in the rules. A batter/runner who is obstructed on a caught fly ball remains out. There is no such exception for an obstructed runner on a ground ball.
Last edited by RKBUmp; Wed Mar 30, 2016 at 06:05am. |
|
|||
Okay, then a RH B hits ground ball to F3 standing on 1B, BR late getting out of the box and bumps into C. Ball fielded cleanly for an out.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important! |
|
|||
I just posed a counter scenario to the argument of the interpretation (which I've heard KR offer a few times) only applies to balls caught in flight.
I am not suggesting umpires start using it as an excuse to start giving away bases or ignoring the rule.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
I cant change what the rules state. An obstructed runner cannot be put out between the 2 bases where obstructed, except for the obvious exceptions we are all aware of in the rule book. Nowhere do the rules say (except in ASA where there is the exception of a runner obstructed while trying to return on a caught fly ball), "except where they would have been out regardless".
FED case play 8.4.3 situation A Is a somewhat similar situation in which the runner would have obviously been out and is grabbed by F6 while advancing. The ruling is obstruction and the runner awarded the base. |
|
|||
Quote:
I know "the runner cannot be called out between the bases they were obstructed". If that is the primary decision point, then I guess there would be no choice but to award third base. However, the ruling states: "The umpire will award R1 and any other runners the base or bases they would have reached had there been no obstruction." So if the umpire's judgment concludes that no way would R1 have made it to third base safely had there been no obstruction, can he call her out? BTW, the ruling also states that F6 is ejected.
__________________
Ted USA & NFHS Softball |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NFHS unreported defensive change | roadking | Softball | 13 | Mon Apr 14, 2014 07:45am |
Defensive 3 seconds NFHS | tw1ns | Basketball | 6 | Wed Feb 13, 2013 02:32pm |
NFHS Obstruction | jwwashburn | Baseball | 2 | Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:13am |
NFHS: Defensive pass interference on touchdown | jodibuck | Football | 4 | Sun Oct 10, 2010 09:46pm |
Requesting a defensive match-up (NFHS) | Rich | Basketball | 11 | Tue May 13, 2003 01:40pm |