The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 11:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3
Play that happened last night:

Adult Softball - USSSA

1 out, runners on 2nd and 3rd. Batter hits deep fly ball to left field. Left fielder makes incredible catch at the fence. Runner on 3rd tags up, scores easily. Runner on 2nd thought the ball was dropped, so he has already touched 3rd, rounded it, then realized the ball was caught. He goes back to second, without retouching 3rd. He is thrown out going back to 2nd - 3rd out. As of now, the run counts because its a timing play, not a force out, correct? The question is, what if the defense appeals the runner missing 3rd on the return to 2nd? Does the run still count?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally posted by ahudgins21
The question is, what if the defense appeals the runner missing 3rd on the return to 2nd? Does the run still count?
That is still a timing play and not a force play. The run would count.

If when rounding third before retreating, the trailing runner passed the preceeding runner, that would have caused the trailing runner to be immediately out with no appeal and with the ball remaining live.
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 03:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by ahudgins21
Play that happened last night:

Adult Softball - USSSA

1 out, runners on 2nd and 3rd. Batter hits deep fly ball to left field. Left fielder makes incredible catch at the fence. Runner on 3rd tags up, scores easily. Runner on 2nd thought the ball was dropped, so he has already touched 3rd, rounded it, then realized the ball was caught. He goes back to second, without retouching 3rd. He is thrown out going back to 2nd - 3rd out. As of now, the run counts because its a timing play, not a force out, correct? The question is, what if the defense appeals the runner missing 3rd on the return to 2nd? Does the run still count?
It's not possible to have a force out anytime that, at the time of the pitcher, there is a vacant base between the runner in question and the batter.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Sep 13, 2003, 11:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: woodville, tx
Posts: 3,156
ahudgins21,

No force, you had open base between -

forget it....checked answers, Mike already got it.

Welcome to the board

glen
__________________
glen _______________________________
"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things
that you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines.
Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails.
Explore. Dream. Discover."
--Mark Twain.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 14, 2003, 07:28am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Besides the vacant base, keep in mind that, unlike in baseball, in ASA softball "whenever the first out of multiple outs is made by the batter, all forces are eliminated." So there can't be any kind of force after a fly out, or after the batter-runner has been put out on the bases.* And there can be no force outs on preceding runners after a following runner has been put out.

*Of course, it might be possible to concoct a crazy situation in which a runner runs the bases in reverse order and creates a force on himself.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 01:29am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,718
"*Of course, it might be possible to concoct a crazy situation in which a runner runs the bases in reverse order and creates a force on himself."

The runner would be out for making a travesty of the game.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 06:48am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by bluezebra
"*Of course, it might be possible to concoct a crazy situation in which a runner runs the bases in reverse order and creates a force on himself."

The runner would be out for making a travesty of the game.

Bob
Not necessarily. A runner is out if the umpire believes they are running the bases in the reverse order to make a travesty of the game.

It is possible that a runner could begin retreating after touching a base to which they were forced. For example, bases loaded, one out. B5 hits a long fly to center and all runners go. As he is rounding 2B, R4 sees F8 dive for the ball and, believing it was caught (it wasn't), reverses his path, retouches 2B and heads back toward 1B. Even though R4 legally touched 2B, when the runner reverses his direction, the force is re-established when he passes the base to which he was originally forced.

You're not going to call the runner out for running the bases in the reverse order, but if the defense gets the ball back to 2B while R4 is still between 1B & 2B, he will be declared out on the force.

__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 10:14am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 517
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
, unlike in baseball, in ASA softball "whenever the first out of multiple outs is made by the batter, all forces are eliminated."
All codes, both BB & SB, if the batter-runner has been put out, no runners may then be forced out, by definition.

The only execption I can think of would be Pony SB, in which a BR (or any other runner) is declared out for removing her helmet, but by rule any forces in effect at the time of removal of the helmet remain.

Roger Greene
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 10:37am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally posted by Roger Greene
The only execption I can think of would be Pony SB, in which a BR (or any other runner) is declared out for removing her helmet, but by rule any forces in effect at the time of removal of the helmet remain.
Also in ASA (Rule 3-5E.1 EFFECT).
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
All codes, both BB & SB, if the batter-runner has been put out, no runners may then be forced out, by definition.

Of course this is true, Roger, for straightforward plays. However, in baseball, outs at missed bases can still be considered force outs after the batter has been put out. In ASA, they cannot.

Example:

Abel on 3B, Baker on 1B, one out. Charles gets a hit down the RF line. Abel scores. Baker goes to 3B but misses 2B. Charles is thrown out at 2B. The defense successfully appeals Baker missing 2B. In OBR, Fed, and NCAA baseball, Baker's out is considered a force play, because he was forced at 2B either at the time he missed the base (Fed, OBR) or at the time the play began (NCAA). (See the BRD for a full explanation.) In ASA, Charles's out at 2B removes the force on Baker. In baseball, Abel's run doesn't count. In ASA, it does.

Similarly, Abel on 3B, Baker on 1B, one out. Charles doubles but misses 1B. Baker misses 2B on the way to 3B. The defense first appeals Charles missing 1B and then appeals Baker missing 2B. In baseball, Abel's run does not count. Regardless of the order of appeals, both outs are force outs (or, technically, the BR before reaching 1B). In ASA, the out on Charles removes the force on Baker, and Abel's run would count.

The "crazy play" I had in mind was something like what Mike described.

[Edited by greymule on Sep 15th, 2003 at 02:49 PM]
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 02:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 517
Greymule,
I'll have to give you that one. I tend to stop thinking of the batter-runner as a BR after reaching 1st and just consider him a runner. However by definition he/she remains the BR until the play ends.

A thought I can't answer without my books. Would the ASA interp apply in Fed SB in your appeal play?

Roger Greene

Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 02:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Question

Are you sure about "In ASA, Charles's out at 2B removes the force on Baker"?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 02:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 3,100
Roger: I'm not sure how Fed rules on that play. I stopped doing Fed before I learned that rule. However, if I had to bet, I'd guess that Fed SB follows Fed BB and not ASA. I suspect that ASA made their own blanket rule to make things easy.

Cecil: I'm sure. ASA casebook play 5.5.2. The "order of appeals" play is covered in 5.5.14.
__________________
greymule
More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men!
Roll Tide!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally posted by CecilOne
Are you sure about "In ASA, Charles's out at 2B removes the force on Baker"?
Yes.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 15, 2003, 05:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
Quote:
Originally posted by greymule
All codes, both BB & SB, if the batter-runner has been put out, no runners may then be forced out, by definition.

Of course this is true, Roger, for straightforward plays. However, in baseball, outs at missed bases can still be considered force outs after the batter has been put out. In ASA, they cannot.

Example:

Abel on 3B, Baker on 1B, one out. Charles gets a hit down the RF line. Abel scores. Baker goes to 3B but misses 2B. Charles is thrown out at 2B. The defense successfully appeals Baker missing 2B. In OBR, Fed, and NCAA baseball, Baker's out is considered a force play, because he was forced at 2B either at the time he missed the base (Fed, OBR) or at the time the play began (NCAA). (See the BRD for a full explanation.) In ASA, Charles's out at 2B removes the force on Baker. In baseball, Abel's run doesn't count. In ASA, it does.

Similarly, Abel on 3B, Baker on 1B, one out. Charles doubles but misses 1B. Baker misses 2B on the way to 3B. The defense first appeals Charles missing 1B and then appeals Baker missing 2B. In baseball, Abel's run does not count. Regardless of the order of appeals, both outs are force outs (or, technically, the BR before reaching 1B). In ASA, the out on Charles removes the force on Baker, and Abel's run would count.

The "crazy play" I had in mind was something like what Mike described.

[Edited by greymule on Sep 15th, 2003 at 02:49 PM]
My books are still in the van and I'm feeling lazy enough that I don't want to go check them. However, I do have the softball rules differences book on the 'puter and this type of play is not listed as differing between Fed & ASA. More and more, Fed is moving closer to ASA's rulings and standards - and they should. In baseball, there is no national governing body. But in softball, ASA is the national governing body. ASA, Fed, and NCAA are moving closer with each year's rulebooks and interps - they have each been sitting on the others' rules committees for at least the past 4 years.

Steve M
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1