Can offens grab facemask

[Reffing Rev.]

I can count on one fist the number of times I've seen a ball carrier flagged for grabbing an opponent's facemask.

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by Reffing Rev.

I can count on one fist the number of times I've seen a ball carrier flagged for grabbing an opponent's facemask.

Can't speak for NFL rules, but otherwise NFHS 9-4-3-h prohibits "grasping an opponents facemask", and applies to EVERY player.

[umpjim]

Originally Posted by ajmc

Can't speak for NFL rules, but otherwise NFHS 9-4-3-h prohibits "grasping an opponents facemask", and applies to EVERY player.

Can't get a pic uploaded due to 100kb limit so you will have to go here to see pics: Laredo Optimist LL Baseball: Albums

Click on the "football" album

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by umpjim

Can't get a pic uploaded due to 100kb limit so you will have to go here to see pics: Laredo Optimist LL Baseball: Albums Click on the "football" album

Can't see any "grasping" in any of these photos.

[umpjim]

Originally Posted by ajmc

Can't see any "grasping" in any of these photos.

You would have to see the video to understand that the impetus for the defenders trajectory derived from the runners arm, wherever it was attached to, benefit of the doubt, horse collar, otherwise facemask?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by umpjim

You would have to see the video to understand that the impetus for the defenders trajectory derived from the runners arm, wherever it was attached to, benefit of the doubt, horse collar, otherwise facemask?

I have seen the video. There's no grasping here, not once. "impetus for the defenders trajectory derived from the runners arm"????? That has nothing to do with anything at all. (And merely saying the term "horse collar" in the context of this play, where contact was entirely from the front, is particularly worrisome).

[umpjim]

Originally Posted by MD Longhorn

I have seen the video. There's no grasping here, not once. "impetus for the defenders trajectory derived from the runners arm"????? That has nothing to do with anything at all. (And merely saying the term "horse collar" in the context of this play, where contact was entirely from the front, is particularly worrisome).

I'm a BB guy so I ignorantly used that term to refer to grabbing the front of the shoulder pads. So, without solid evidence of why the defender is going down no official will call it a facemask. Makes sense. Thanks.

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by umpjim

You would have to see the video to understand that the impetus for the defenders trajectory derived from the runners arm, wherever it was attached to, benefit of the doubt, horse collar, otherwise facemask?

Don't know which rule code your suggesting, but you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear under ANY of them.

[Welpe]

Originally Posted by umpjim

wherever it was attached to, benefit of the doubt, horse collar, otherwise facemask?

Here's where I think the disconnect lies. We are not supposed to guess why a player's head jerks around or how he suddenly and violently is yanked back to the ground. In these plays, if we don't know, we don't throw (or shouldn't anyways).

Many times guessing on facemasks and horsecollars result in an incorrect foul being called. This is a concept a fair amount of coaches don't seem to grasp and can't believe that we missed an "obvious" facemask.

[JasonLJ]

Originally Posted by Reffing Rev.

I can count on one fist the number of times I've seen a ball carrier flagged for grabbing an opponent's facemask.

I've called it twice. Can't grasp the facemask, period.

[APG]

Originally Posted by Reffing Rev.

I can count on one fist the number of times I've seen a ball carrier flagged for grabbing an opponent's facemask.

Just saw this called in the Oklahoma/West Virginia game early in the 4th quarter.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by APG

Just saw this called in the Oklahoma/West Virginia game early in the 4th quarter.

I though that was a pretty bad call. Didn't even grab it.

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by OKREF

I though that was a pretty bad call. Didn't even grab it.

The only thing that MATTERS is what the covering official SAW.

[OKREF]

Originally Posted by ajmc

The only thing that MATTERS is what the covering official SAW.

And he didn't see it correctly, in my opinion.

[ajmc]

Originally Posted by OKREF

And he didn't see it correctly, in my opinion.

Opinions are like anal orifices, everyone has one and it's a little different than everyone elses. On a football field, the covering official's "opinion" is the ONLY one that matters (in NFHS games).