NFHS Additional Rules per helmeted players

[HLin NC]

repeatedly

Don't know, Fed has never defined repeatedly that I know of. I'd venture they expect it to be called very conservatively. I can think of numerous times I have called consecutive encroachments, particularly on a try, and we've never invoked the repeatedly cause. In fact K normally declines the penalty on a try anyway.

I brought this point up earlier in the thread. Its probably extreme but I can see DPI being committed on every pass play in a goal to go situation. I would imagine the repeatedly scenario would be invoked after the ball could no longer be moved for penalty enforcement, which is strictly my own opinion.

It would boil down a game of chicken between A and B's head coaches. At some point A is probably going to flinch and call a run play.

I forsee the AFD coming back very, very soon.

[maven]

Originally Posted by HLin NC

I would imagine the repeatedly scenario would be invoked after the ball could no longer be moved for penalty enforcement, which is strictly my own opinion.

That's excellent. Consider it adopted for my crew.