The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  3 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 08:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by InsideTheStripe View Post
I don't think it was 'clearly afterwards'.

They were both still in the air when there were four arms around the ball. The 'four arm' situation continued onto the field of play.

I don't have a problem with the call either way.

If I had to guess how the NFL wants this particular play called, I bet there will be a downgrade on a certain LOS offical. The call would have been a much easier sell had we not had differing, simultaneous signals from the covering officials. Verbal communication prior to a signal would have helped considerably here.
Of all the things discussed sorrounding the play, the "blarge" is what intrigues me the most. Those two officials looked directly at each other for a brief moment, then amazingly displayed different calls. Unbelievable.

There is absolutely NO hurry to make a call in that situation. Communication and agreement THEN the SAME call should have been communicated on the field. Even if a call is "wrong", we officials know that we are only helping ourselves if we all show the same ruling on the field.

Last edited by DLH17; Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 08:29am.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 09:34am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLH17 View Post
Of all the things discussed sorrounding the play, the "blarge" is what intrigues me the most. Those two officials looked directly at each other for a brief moment, then amazingly displayed different calls. Unbelievable.
I don't see two different calls. I see one stop-the-clock signal, and a TD signal. As Jeff notes previously, they don't use the stop-the-clock signal on touchbacks.

This is the football equivalent of one official raising his hand and the other going straight to the player control signal.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I don't see two different calls. I see one stop-the-clock signal, and a TD signal. As Jeff notes previously, they don't use the stop-the-clock signal on touchbacks.

This is the football equivalent of one official raising his hand and the other going straight to the player control signal.
So, you are saying both officials had a TD?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 09:53am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLH17 View Post
So, you are saying both officials had a TD?
I'm not saying that. I'm saying I don't know what the other official had, and don't see how anyone does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Sorry, not buying it. A lot of officials use a stop the clock on touchbacks. I'm not sure I've ever seen one use a stop the clock signal on a *touchdown*, though.
You could be right. I've only had one close TB interception, and I didn't use the stop the clock signal; but mine was close to an incomplete as the defender was running out of bounds.

While I don't think this is quite the "blarge," it does seem like it's close. If anything, it seems the one official wants to talk about it.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:11am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I'm not saying that. I'm saying I don't know what the other official had, and don't see how anyone does.
And, that is the issue I have with the way the play was managed by the two covering officials.

They clearly looked at each other before either gave a signal. I wish a reverse camera angle were available for us to see if they said anything to each other in that brief moment. Anything at all would have been good..."I have a touchdown, what do you have?" Instead, they gave two different signals which only invites confusion and opens the crew up to even more criticism.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:18am
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
I've seen guys stop the clock before a TB signal. Can't recall if it's NFL or NCAA.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:22am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLH17 View Post
Anything at all would have been good..."I have a touchdown, what do you have?" Instead, they gave two different signals which only invites confusion and opens the crew up to even more criticism.
I believe he said, "I have a touchdown, you call it dead," and the other guy said, "Ok."
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbcrowder View Post
I believe he said, "I have a touchdown, you call it dead," and the other guy said, "Ok."
Fair enough. If that is true, then it answers my question. Nonetheless, two different signals still "looks" bad and invites *unecessary* criticism of the crew, imo.

Yes, they will still get criticized for the call, however, if both officials signal TD, there is less confusion and just looks better. Shows the crew is effectively communicating in pressure situations. That (at some level) counts for something in my book. Maybe it doesn't matter to anyone else. And that's ok, I guess.

Last edited by DLH17; Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 11:21am.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 522
Part of the problem was the announcers (yeah, big shock)....

The not the BJ signaling time out and they said "that is what you signal before touchback. He is signaling an interception." Ummm, no.
__________________
If the play is designed to fool someone, make sure you aren't the fool.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 11:45am
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam View Post
I'm not saying that. I'm saying I don't know what the other official had, and don't see how anyone does.



You could be right. I've only had one close TB interception, and I didn't use the stop the clock signal; but mine was close to an incomplete as the defender was running out of bounds.

While I don't think this is quite the "blarge," it does seem like it's close. If anything, it seems the one official wants to talk about it.
That is what I took out of this signal is the BJ felt they would discuss the play because he did not have possession either way. I think he gave the signal most of all out of surrender as he did not seem to have anything. I think he was just trying to find the ball and saw players on the ground with their hands on it.

Actually not sure how the BJ could see anything as there were other players in his way. And when I hear people ask him to be somewhere different, I am not so sure about that perspective at all. The BJ stays mostly in the middle of the field and would not have time on a deep play to get far over without getting in the middle of the play. I think people are just being nitpicky on this issue if they really think that a BJ is going to be in any better position. His goal is to stay on the end line and make sure someone is not touching the line and help if that is a factor.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 10:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: depends on your perspective
Posts: 697
BTW, I've seen the white hat on these replacement crews use the stop clock mechanic on touchbacks more than once this season.

When I saw the BJ use the stop clock mechanic last night, it communicated change of possession to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/92493-last-play-gb-seattle.html
Posted By For Type Date
NFL, Referees Reach Agreement to End Lockout - Catholic Answers Forums This thread Refback Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:19pm
The Official 2012 NFL Thread - Page 6 - Corner-Carvers Forums This thread Refback Tue Sep 25, 2012 08:01pm
If anyone from the NFL reads here - Page 9 - The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com This thread Refback Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:17am

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Storm in Seattle ronald Softball 6 Fri May 22, 2009 12:53pm
What's This? It doesn't snow in Seattle! IRISHMAFIA Softball 39 Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:06pm
First base play Seattle Mariners rainmaker Baseball 29 Tue Aug 14, 2007 06:26am
Dallas vs. Seattle mcrowder Football 28 Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:12am
Boston-Seattle play PS2Man Baseball 12 Thu Aug 31, 2006 05:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1