The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #136 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:10pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
And that's just where we differ. I don't believe simply having his hand in there constitutes control. He doesn't have complete and firm control of the ball IMO. IMO, the DB has two hands on the ball and demonstrates complete and firm control of the ball. At best, IMO, one could argue the WR got control of the ball after the DB already had control.
Actually the last sentence is what I believed happened. The problem for the defense is he did not have possession first.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #137 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:20pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
I've seen guys stop the clock before a TB signal. Can't recall if it's NFL or NCAA.
Yes. I have seen officials give the "stop clock" signal immediately followed by the "touchback" signal. The back judge obviously wasn't signalling a touchdown since he gave the "stop clock" signal, so he had something different than the guy who signaled touchdown.

Quote:
Originally Posted by APG View Post
And that's just where we differ. I don't believe simply having his hand in there constitutes control. He doesn't have complete and firm control of the ball IMO. IMO, the DB has two hands on the ball and demonstrates complete and firm control of the ball. At best, IMO, one could argue the WR got control of the ball after the DB already had control.
I agree. I just don't see how the Seattle WR had control/possession of the ball in the same way the Green Bay DB did. I still think this call was awful and the mechanics were awful.
Reply With Quote
  #138 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:25pm
APG APG is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Actually the last sentence is what I believed happened. The problem for the defense is he did not have possession first.

Peace
Are you trying to say that Tate came back to the ground first and "completed the process of the catch" before the DB did? Seems to me that the since he controlled the ball first, assuming he completes the process of the catch, he goes to who gets it first...regardless of if the second player returns to the ground first.
__________________
Chaos isn't a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some, given a chance to climb, they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions.

Only the ladder is real. The climb is all there is.

Reply With Quote
  #139 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Actually the last sentence is what I believed happened. The problem for the defense is he did not have possession first.

Peace
Just as the Green Bay DB puts both hands on the ball on the way down, Tate's right hand grabs the GB DB's arm/wrist. His left arm is out of the picture, but it would be impossible for him to have that hand on the ball because of where it is. As they hit the ground, Tate sticks his right hand on the ball while the GB DB still has it clutched to his chest.

I just don't buy it.
Reply With Quote
  #140 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:33pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Yes. I have seen officials give the "stop clock" signal immediately followed by the "touchback" signal. The back judge obviously wasn't signalling a touchdown since he gave the "stop clock" signal, so he had something different than the guy who signaled touchdown.
You are not going to signal a TD if you do not have a TD. That means that if he cannot tell, he is not going to give a signal. That is basic stuff in 7 man mechanics as his line was not threatened (meaning no one crossed or touched the line) and if he cannot see any catch, he is not going to rule anything. All he can do is offer some information, but he only should be signalling a TB if he has one and that was not his signal. And to say "I have seen a TB signal after a stop clock signal" is irrelevant because he never gave any TB signal by all accounts. If it was me, I would probably have done a similar thing if I wanted to discuss the situation. I probably would have been doing this earlier, but that is only based on seeing the video. But if he had a TB and only a TB, then he would have come up with that signal. But I do not think he even saw the completion of the catch and that is why he did not signal anything that said he had a TD or TB.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #141 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:35pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by zm1283 View Post
Just as the Green Bay DB puts both hands on the ball on the way down, Tate's right hand grabs the GB DB's arm/wrist. His left arm is out of the picture, but it would be impossible for him to have that hand on the ball because of where it is. As they hit the ground, Tate sticks his right hand on the ball while the GB DB still has it clutched to his chest.

I just don't buy it.
I am not asking you to buy anything. Just stating that you cannot have a catch completed until you come to the ground. Again that is the part of the rule many do not seem to want to deal with, but mention all these other non-factor issues like how many arms are on the ball. How many arms on the ball mean nothing in any catch, that is obvious if you watch much football.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #142 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post
Absolutely.

BTW, are you the next to change your name.

Peace
What do you mean?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #143 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:50pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
What do you mean?
LOL!!!

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #144 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 12:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
it looked to me like the right call
I thought I was the only one in the world that thought that. And I didn't even think it was all that close, but I didn't know the NFL rule for sure.

Had this happened in an NCAA game and I was the calling official, I would have ruled it a TD.
Reply With Quote
  #145 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 41
Uncalled for. Stop it now.

-Welpe

Last edited by Welpe; Tue Sep 25, 2012 at 01:19pm.
Reply With Quote
  #146 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
Which is contrary to what Gerry Austin stated on ESPN last night.
He really did screw this up. It's one thing for the idiotic talking heads and football jocks on ESPN to screw this up; it's entirely another for an established veteran official - one that's supposedly an assigner as well - to get up there and blow it. He's supposed to know this stuff; I imagine that's why ESPN hired him.
Reply With Quote
  #147 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:41pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trap View Post
Uncalled for. Stop it now.

-Welpe
OK Welpe, you are next. Names are falling like flies around here.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #148 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:51pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Palatine, IL
Posts: 103
In High School this 100% would have been called a TD as you cannot have possession until you hit the ground. Again, I don't know the NFL rule nuances such as control vs possession and what not, so I am not qualified to talk about the ruling on the field.

But in HS 100% a TD.
Reply With Quote
  #149 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:55pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,520
BTW, the guy that was the Back Judge, he is a former Big 12 and Arena Football League Official. That is the kind of guy that actually gets hired in the NFL as the Arena League was often used as a training ground for NFL prospects and current NFL officials.

And the formation was set to the opposite side of the field with trips, so I want to know where he else he was supposed to be located?

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #150 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 25, 2012, 01:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Pretty sure that OPI would have been called in most HS games!
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: https://forum.officiating.com/football/92493-last-play-gb-seattle.html
Posted By For Type Date
NFL, Referees Reach Agreement to End Lockout - Catholic Answers Forums This thread Refback Thu Sep 27, 2012 12:19pm
The Official 2012 NFL Thread - Page 6 - Corner-Carvers Forums This thread Refback Tue Sep 25, 2012 08:01pm
If anyone from the NFL reads here - Page 9 - The DIS Discussion Forums - DISboards.com This thread Refback Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:17am

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Storm in Seattle ronald Softball 6 Fri May 22, 2009 12:53pm
What's This? It doesn't snow in Seattle! IRISHMAFIA Softball 39 Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:06pm
First base play Seattle Mariners rainmaker Baseball 29 Tue Aug 14, 2007 06:26am
Dallas vs. Seattle mcrowder Football 28 Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:12am
Boston-Seattle play PS2Man Baseball 12 Thu Aug 31, 2006 05:33pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1