QB goes in motion

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by mbyron

On the contrary, I understood your post thoroughly and completely. And that's how I know it was utterly irrelevant to the discussion in this thread.

Merely posting a true statement does not make you relevant.

Well I was not talking to you in the first place (funny how that happens like that) and if you might be thinking one thing, someone else might be thinking another. If the poster was not talking about that, he can clarify what he was trying to understand. That is what happens here and it really do not matter what you find relevant or not.

Peace

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Well I was not talking to you in the first place (funny how that happens like that) and if you might be thinking one thing, someone else might be thinking another. If the poster was not talking about that, he can clarify what he was trying to understand. That is what happens here and it really do not matter what you find relevant or not.

You weren't talking to the OP either, since your comment was irrelevant. And if relevance is irrelevant, why have threads at all?

And: it happens here only because people post comments in threads that are irrelevant to the OP.

New and pertinent: that's the name of the game. So far, you've mastered only 50%.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by mbyron

You weren't talking to the OP either, since your comment was irrelevant. And if relevance is irrelevant, why have threads at all?

And: it happens here only because people post comments in threads that are irrelevant to the OP.

New and pertinent: that's the name of the game. So far, you've mastered only 50%.

You are right, I have no idea what I was referring to or why I said what I did. Thank you for letting me know professor. I will keep that in mind the next time I comment on something. Once again, I was not talking to you so why do you really care?

Peace

[BuckeyeRef]

I had a similar play in a sub-varsity game. On the PAT, A lined up in the muddle huddle then sent a man in motion behind the snapper. As he passed by the snapper, he put his hands under center but continued his motion. Do we have anything?

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by BuckeyeRef

I had a similar play in a sub-varsity game. On the PAT, A lined up in the muddle huddle then sent a man in motion behind the snapper. As he passed by the snapper, he put his hands under center but continued his motion. Do we have anything?

Maybe I'm an idiot... but what rule do you think was broken here?

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

Maybe I'm an idiot... but what rule do you think was broken here?

You might not be an idiot (that is for others to decide anyway), but it is not uncommon to have people claim this should be a foul and often when video is show and any movement by the QB takes place (usually going under center by leaning forward or putting their hands down to receive the snap), there are many that want that to be called, which is why I made the statement I did awhile back, but some people I guess have never heard this claim before. I have and hope that any official that sees this is not being too technical and calling a foul. And the very reason you are now seeing Robert make a claim this is illegal on some level.

Peace

[Robert Goodman]

There are many types of movement a QB might make that don't make it look like he's just taken the snap. However, what could be the purpose of having someone in motion across the formation put his hands under and then continue across, except to make it look like he'd taken the snap?

[CT1]

Originally Posted by BuckeyeRef

I had a similar play in a sub-varsity game. On the PAT, A lined up in the muddle huddle then sent a man in motion behind the snapper. As he passed by the snapper, he put his hands under center but continued his motion. Do we have anything?

Illegal touching

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by BuckeyeRef

I had a similar play in a sub-varsity game. On the PAT, A lined up in the muddle huddle then sent a man in motion behind the snapper. As he passed by the snapper, he put his hands under center but continued his motion. Do we have anything?

Assuming the ball wasn't snapped at that point, it's a false start -- simulating action at the snap. In fact, that's a paradigmatic type of tactic the rule against simulating action at the snap was written against.

[MD Longhorn]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

Assuming the ball wasn't snapped at that point, it's a false start -- simulating action at the snap. In fact, that's a paradigmatic type of tactic the rule against simulating action at the snap was written against.

No. The number of ways that is wrong is nearly without number. What action was simulated? Preparation for receipt of a possible snap? No. And no, that's NOT what the rule is referring to. that rule is more for the running back that suddenly starts forward on a false count, but then goes in motion. The SUDDEN start, designed to simulate the beginning of the play, is what is a false start.

Now... say your in motion guy reaches under then suddenly drops back a yard as if to prepare to pass --- then we have a false start.

The OP? No way.

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by mbcrowder

What action was simulated? Preparation for receipt of a possible snap? No.

No, thrusting the hands under and then away from center, as if receiving the ball while he ran across the formation. NCAA's rules committee statement under "shift plays" interpret'ns refers to this as "the quarterback `chucking' hands at center".

The SUDDEN start, designed to simulate the beginning of the play, is what is a false start.

Now... say your in motion guy reaches under then suddenly drops back a yard as if to prepare to pass --- then we have a false start.

If he's a man in motion coming across the backfield, as was specified by BuckeyeRef, there's practically no way it's not a sudden movement. How slow would he have to be moving for it not to look like he's taking the snap? BuckeyeRef didn't say he paused there, but rather that he continued his motion.