The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Sep 12, 2010, 09:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Japan
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goodman View Post
If not possessed by the QB, the snap has been batted illegally.
Why? Due to the fact that the muffed snap/fumble went forward?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Sep 13, 2010, 09:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 463
Quote:
Originally Posted by gene2112 View Post
Why? Due to the fact that the muffed snap/fumble went forward?
The snap is, by definition, a backwards pass or handoff - and it's not a handoff in this case. The offense is not allowed to bat a backward pass forward; thus, illegal batting.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Legal "trick" plays? SC Ump Football 13 Mon Sep 13, 2010 01:03pm
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
"serious" foul by offended team during their advantage play Robert Goodman Rugby 4 Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:21pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1